mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

TULIP: Targeted LLM Unlearning at Layers Identified Per-Input

arXiv 2609.34591 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Representation-level unlearning modifies the intermediate hidden states of LLMs. Although knowledge is distributed across layers, existing methods operate at a single fixed layer for the entire forget set. We ask whether such a fixed layer is sufficient for unlearning. To answer this, we design a hijacking experiment that grafts hidden states of the target model into an oracle model. The oracle cannot produce the forget answer on its own, yet it produces the answer from the grafted state. This indicates the answer is already formed at an intermediate layer and read out afterward. Moreover, the layer where formation ends varies widely across inputs. Motivated by these findings, we propose Targeted Unlearning at Layers Identified Per-input (TULIP). For each input, TULIP uses the logit lens to locate the formation-readout boundary and removes the hidden state's alignment with the forget answer's unembedding vector at that layer. TULIP outperforms output- and representation-level baselines on TOFU, PISTOL, and WMDP across Llama, Qwen, and Zephyr models. It also remains robust to paraphrase and quantization attacks. Beyond standalone use, its per-input layer selection serves as a plug-and-play component that further improves existing methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 33 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

Builds on

33 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 17

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Position: The Term "Machine Unlearning" Is Overused in LLMs8 May
  2. 2026Maximizing Local Entropy Where It Matters: Prefix-Aware Localized LLM Unlearning6 Jan
  3. 2025Improving Fisher Information Estimation and Efficiency for LoRA-based LLM Unlearning29 Aug
  4. 2025Invariance Makes LLM Unlearning Resilient Even to Unanticipated Downstream Fine-Tuning2 Jun
  5. 2025Unlearning Isn't Deletion: Investigating Reversibility of Machine Unlearning in LLMs22 May
  6. 2025Erasing Without Remembering: Implicit Knowledge Forgetting in Large Language Models27 Feb
  7. 2025LLM Unlearning via Neural Activation Redirection11 Feb
  8. 2024Catastrophic Failure of LLM Unlearning via Quantization21 Oct
  9. 2024Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning9 Oct
  10. 2024An Adversarial Perspective on Machine Unlearning for AI Safety26 Sep
  11. 2024Towards Robust and Parameter-Efficient Knowledge Unlearning for LLMs13 Aug
  12. 2024Unlearning or Obfuscating? Jogging the Memory of Unlearned LLMs via Benign Relearning19 Jun
5 more
  1. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
  2. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
  3. 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMs3 Oct
  4. 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models4 Oct
  5. 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning4 Mar

Other references · 16

  1. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,047
  2. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,181
  3. 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,323
  4. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,056
  5. 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 600
  6. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 532
  7. 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 529
  8. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignmentcited by 502
  9. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 498
  10. 2022What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy?cited by 195
  11. 2023What Formal Languages Can Transformers Express? A Surveycited by 121
  12. 2026Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Modelscited by 67
4 more
  1. 2022A Measure-Theoretic Characterization of Tight Language Modelscited by 32
  2. 2024Looking Beyond The Top-1: Transformers Determine Top Tokens In Ordercited by 12
  3. 2024Next-token prediction capacity: general upper bounds and a lower bound for transformerscited by 11
  4. 2026Factual Retrieval in LLMs Is a Redundant, Distributed and Non-Contiguous Processcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025BLUR: A Benchmark for LLM Unlearning Robust to Forget-Retain Overlap
  2. 2026Forgetting Only What Matters: Layer-Selective Unlearning toward Robust LLMs
  3. 2026Do LLMs Really Forget? Hidden-State Leakage in Model Unlearning and How to Fix it
  4. 2026Robust LLM Unlearning Against Relearning Attacks: The Minor Components in Representations Matter
  5. 2026Making LLMs Truly Forget: Deep Unlearning by Searching, Selecting, and Severing Knowledge Paths
  6. 2025DRAGON: Guard LLM Unlearning in Context via Negative Detection and Reasoning
  7. 2025Collapse of Irrelevant Representations (CIR) Ensures Robust and Non-Disruptive LLM Unlearning
  8. 2026Quantization-Robust Unlearning through the Lens of Retain-Forget Loss Landscapes Interaction