M3-Score: Fidelity, Memorization and Coverage as Separate Axes for Evaluating Generative Radiology Image Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantitative evaluation of generative models for radiology remains challenging. Clinically relevant structures are often small and infrequent, feature spaces learned from natural images may represent them poorly, and a single summary score cannot distinguish limited fidelity from limited diversity. This study proposes the Medical Multi-axis Maximum Mean Discrepancy score (M3-Score), an evaluation framework based on RadioDINO-s16, a frozen vision transformer pretrained on radiology images. M3-Score reports three complementary axes computed at pre-specified encoder depths: fidelity, measured by an unbiased multi-bandwidth radial basis function (RBF) MMD2 at the final block; memorization, measured by nearest-neighbor distances at 75% depth; and coverage, defined as the fraction of real images with a generated neighbor within their k-nearest-neighbor radius at 33% depth. Reference sets are sampled across subjects to limit the influence of correlated slices. On BraTS brain MRI, the fidelity axis ordered five comparison sets of increasing severity (Spearman ρ = 1.00), and a subject-disjoint real set yielded MMD2 = 0 (permutation p = 1). An unconditional denoising diffusion probabilistic model achieved MMD2 = 0.073 (95% confidence interval [0.071, 0.080]) but covered only 38% of the real distribution. Under progressive mode dropping, k-NN manifold recall increased at all twelve encoder blocks, whereas the proposed coverage estimator decreased monotonically (ρ = -1.00). RadioDINO-s16 features separated real brain MRI from generated samples with a ROC-AUC of 0.819, compared with 0.555 for InceptionV3 and 0.582 for CLIP. Across a twentyfold range of sample sizes, the mean M3 value varied by a factor of 1.05, compared with 2.52 for the Fr'echet Inception Distance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.
Builds on
29 of 47 references.
References · 29
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
- 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
- 2018Demystifying MMD GANscited by 1,268
- 2019Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Modelscited by 925
- 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 508
- 2021The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS 2021 Benchmark on Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiogenomic Classificationcited by 507
- 2020Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative Modelscited by 425
17 more
- 2023Rethinking FID: Towards a Better Evaluation Metric for Image Generationcited by 303
- 2022Diffusion Models for Medical Image Analysis: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 269
- 2022Brain Imaging Generation with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 267
- 2021How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Modelscited by 193
- 2024Exploring scalable medical image encoders beyond text supervisioncited by 129
- 2019Association of genomic subtypes of lower-grade gliomas with shape features automatically extracted by a deep learning algorithmcited by 76
- 2021GANs for Medical Image Synthesis: An Empirical Studycited by 64
- 2024WDM: 3D Wavelet Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Medical Image Synthesiscited by 56
- 2023Deep Learning Approaches for Data Augmentation in Medical Imaging: A Reviewcited by 48
- 2019Machine Learning with Multi-Site Imaging Data: An Empirical Study on the Impact of Scanner Effectscited by 40
- 2021How I failed machine learning in medical imaging -- shortcomings and recommendationscited by 37
- 2023Feature Extraction for Generative Medical Imaging Evaluation: New Evidence Against an Evolving Trendcited by 24
- 2024Similarity and Quality Metrics for MR Image-To-Image Translationcited by 20
- 2024Fr'echet Radiomic Distance (FRD): A Versatile Metric for Comparing Medical Imaging Datasetscited by 19
- 2024A study of why we need to reassess full reference image quality assessment with medical imagescited by 16
- 2025Metrics that matter: Evaluating image quality metrics for medical image generationcited by 12
- 2022Assessing the ability of generative adversarial networks to learn canonical medical image statisticscited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Non-Reference Quality Assessment for Medical Imaging: Application to Synthetic Brain MRIs
- 2026The Learnability Gap in Medical Latent Diffusion
- 2023MRI Reconstruction with Side Information using Diffusion Models
- 2026What Makes a Good Medical Image Tokenizer? Rethinking Reconstruction and Generation in Medical Image Tokenization
- 2026MedQ-Deg: A Multidimensional Benchmark for Evaluating MLLMs Across Medical Image Quality Degradations
- 2025Expert Validation of Synthetic Cervical Spine Radiographs Generated with a Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model
- 2023Trade-offs in Fine-tuned Diffusion Models Between Accuracy and Interpretability
- 2023Aligning Synthetic Medical Images with Clinical Knowledge using Human Feedback