MetaBench-Harness: Unlocking End-to-End Optimization of Benchmark Harnesses
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Rapid progress in Large Language Models (LLMs) is saturating static benchmarks faster than they can be designed. While existing automated evolution frameworks attempt to generate harder questions by perturbing individual tasks, they remain constrained by rigid, hard-coded generation rules. Moving beyond the evolution of isolated tasks, we propose to optimize the benchmark generation workflow itself end to end with MetaBench-Harness, a dual-loop search framework. Specifically, the inner loop utilizes a benchmark harness to generate a new benchmark in each round, while the outer meta-harness orchestration layer iteratively refines and searches over harness implementations based on historical evolution trajectories. By applying MetaBench-Harness to the competitive programming CodeContests and Olympiad mathematics AIME-2024 datasets, we demonstrate that the evolved benchmarks are challenging and discriminative for frontier models. Trajectory and quality analyses verify that MetaBench-Harness enables multi-dimensional evolution, steadily improving evolution reasonableness, benchmark competency, and evaluator robustness across successive rounds. Furthermore, case studies reveal its effective utilization of diverse difficulty levers to reframe problems and elevate required capabilities. Ultimately, this work provides a solution to the pressing challenge of benchmark saturation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.
Builds on
25 of 36 references.
References · 25
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,427
- 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,295
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
- 2022Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questionscited by 911
- 2026Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligencecited by 449
- 2024AFlow: Automating Agentic Workflow Generationcited by 395
- 2024Automated Design of Agentic Systemscited by 360
- 2026Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnessescited by 248
- 2022Evolution through Large Modelscited by 131
13 more
- 2025Recursive Language Modelscited by 94
- 2025MemEvolve: Meta-Evolution of Agent Memory Systemscited by 81
- 2024Benchmark Self-Evolving: A Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic LLM Evaluationcited by 73
- 2024EvoCodeBench: An Evolving Code Generation Benchmark with Domain-Specific Evaluationscited by 33
- 2025A Survey on Data Contamination for Large Language Modelscited by 33
- 2024AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Researchcited by 24
- 2026Learning to Continually Learn via Meta-learning Agentic Memory Designscited by 16
- 2025AdamMeme: Adaptively Probe the Reasoning Capacity of Multimodal Large Language Models on Harmfulnesscited by 7
- 2025AutoEvoEval: An Automated Framework for Evolving Close-Ended LLM Evaluation Datacited by 3
- 2026CodaRAG: Connecting the Dots with Associativity Inspired by Complementary Learningcited by 3
- 2026Only Ask What You Don't Know: Grounded Delta Planning for Efficient Multi-step RAGcited by 3
- 2025JudgeAgent: Beyond Static Benchmarks for Knowledge-Driven and Dynamic LLM Evaluationcited by 2
- 2026TRACER: A Semantic-Aware Framework for Fine-Grained Contamination Detection in Code LLMscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.