mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research

arXiv 2410.22394 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2024cs.CLcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Numerous studies have assessed the proficiency of AI systems, particularly large language models (LLMs), in facilitating everyday tasks such as email writing, question answering, and creative content generation. However, researchers face unique challenges and opportunities in leveraging LLMs for their own work, such as brainstorming research ideas, designing experiments, and writing or reviewing papers. In this study, we introduce AAAR-1.0, a benchmark dataset designed to evaluate LLM performance in three fundamental, expertise-intensive research tasks: (i) EquationInference, assessing the correctness of equations based on the contextual information in paper submissions; (ii) ExperimentDesign, designing experiments to validate research ideas and solutions; (iii) PaperWeakness, identifying weaknesses in paper submissions; and (iv) REVIEWCRITIQUE, identifying each segment in human reviews is deficient or not. AAAR-1.0 differs from prior benchmarks in two key ways: first, it is explicitly research-oriented, with tasks requiring deep domain expertise; second, it is researcher-oriented, mirroring the primary activities that researchers engage in on a daily basis. An evaluation of both open-source and proprietary LLMs reveals their potential as well as limitations in conducting sophisticated research tasks. We will keep iterating AAAR-1.0 to new versions.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2024.

Builds on

31 of 57 references.

References · 31

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  5. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  6. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  7. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  8. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  9. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  10. 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,823
  11. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
  12. 2024How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suitescited by 1,050
19 more
  1. 2023VILA: On Pre-training for Visual Language Modelscited by 692
  2. 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 613
  3. 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 469
  4. 2023MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentationcited by 366
  5. 2024Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researcherscited by 363
  6. 2024BioMistral: A Collection of Open-Source Pretrained Large Language Models for Medical Domainscited by 301
  7. 2024ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific Discoverycited by 235
  8. 2023Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysiscited by 200
  9. 2024CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Reviewcited by 148
  10. 2024LlaSMol: Advancing Large Language Models for Chemistry with a Large-Scale, Comprehensive, High-Quality Instruction Tuning Datasetcited by 128
  11. 2024Leave No Document Behind: Benchmarking Long-Context LLMs with Extended Multi-Doc QAcited by 122
  12. 2024AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agentscited by 93
  13. 2024MLR-Copilot: Autonomous Machine Learning Research based on Large Language Models Agentscited by 67
  14. 2023ML-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models and Agents for Machine Learning Tasks on Repository-Level Codecited by 65
  15. 2024LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewingcited by 62
  16. 2024Automated Focused Feedback Generation for Scientific Writing Assistancecited by 33
  17. 2024Can Large Language Models Unlock Novel Scientific Research Ideas?cited by 24
  18. 2023NLPBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Solving NLP Problemscited by 8
  19. 2023TrainerAgent: Customizable and Efficient Model Training through LLM-Powered Multi-Agent Systemcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 13; 2026: 10.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agentscited by 204
  2. 2025Agent Learning via Early Experiencecited by 85
  3. 2025LLM Agents for Education: Advances and Applicationscited by 59
  4. 2025TreeReview: A Dynamic Tree of Questions Framework for Deep and Efficient LLM-based Scientific Peer Reviewcited by 31
  5. 2025MLRC-Bench: Can Language Agents Solve Machine Learning Research Challenges?cited by 28
  6. 2026AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilotcited by 19
  7. 2024AIGS: Generating Science from AI-Powered Automated Falsificationcited by 18
  8. 2025Prompt-Reverse Inconsistency: LLM Self-Inconsistency Beyond Generative Randomness and Prompt Paraphrasingcited by 14
  9. 2025FLAWS: A Benchmark for Error Identification and Localization in Scientific Paperscited by 14
  10. 2025Evolutionary Perspectives on the Evaluation of LLM-Based AI Agents: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 13
  11. 2025AbGen: Evaluating Large Language Models in Ablation Study Design and Evaluation for Scientific Researchcited by 13
  12. 2025Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Frameworkcited by 11
12 more
  1. 2025Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluatorcited by 9
  2. 2025From Hypothesis to Publication: A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Driven Research Support Systemscited by 8
  3. 2026RIGOURATE: Quantifying Scientific Exaggeration with Evidence-Aligned Claim Evaluationcited by 3
  4. 2025Empowering Real-World: A Survey on the Technology, Practice, and Evaluation of LLM-driven Industry Agentscited by 2
  5. 2026What Makes a Good AI Review? Concern-Level Diagnostics for AI Peer Reviewcited by 2
  6. 2026EGTR-Review: Efficient Evidence-Grounded Scientific Peer Review Generation via Multi-Agent Teacher Distillationcited by 1
  7. 2026ReasFlow: Assisting Reasoning-Centric Scientific Discovery in Applied Mathematics via a Knowledge-Based Multi-Agent Systemcited by 1
  8. 2026Can LLM design high-quality experiments? A Comprehensive and Systematic Benchmark on Autonomous Experimental Designcited by 1
  9. 2026Critically Engaged Pragmatism: Scientific Norm and Social, Pragmatist Epistemology for AI Science Evaluation Toolscited by 0
  10. 2026Tree-of-Concerns: Hierarchical Multi-Agent Debate for Unstated-Limitation Extraction in Scientific Critiquecited by 0
  11. 2026Propose to Learn, Learn to Propose: Evaluability-Aware Assistance under Bounded Rationalitycited by 0
  12. 2026MetaBench-Harness: Unlocking End-to-End Optimization of Benchmark Harnessescited by 0