Structure-Aware Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification for Neural Operator PDE Surrogates
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural operators (NOs) provide fast, resolution-invariant surrogates for mapping input fields to PDE solution fields, but their predictions can exhibit significant epistemic uncertainty due to finite data, imperfect optimization, and distribution shift. For practical deployment in scientific computing, uncertainty quantification (UQ) must be both computationally efficient and spatially faithful, i.e., uncertainty bands should align with the localized residual structures that matter for downstream risk management. We propose a structure-aware epistemic UQ scheme that exploits the modular anatomy common to modern NOs (lifting-propagation-recovering). Instead of applying unstructured weight perturbations (e.g., naive dropout) across the entire network, we restrict Monte Carlo sampling to a module-aligned subspace by injecting stochasticity only into the lifting module, and treat the learned solver dynamics (propagation and recovery) as deterministic. We instantiate this principle with two lightweight lifting-level perturbations, including channel-wise multiplicative feature dropout and a Gaussian feature perturbation with matched variance, followed by standard calibration to construct uncertainty bands. Experiments on challenging PDE benchmarks (including discontinuous-coefficient Darcy flow and geometry-shifted 3D car CFD surrogates) demonstrate that the proposed structure-aware design yields more reliable coverage, tighter bands, and improved residual-uncertainty alignment compared with common baselines, while remaining practical in runtime.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2026.
Builds on
11 of 19 references.
References · 11
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
- 2023GNOT: A General Neural Operator Transformer for Operator Learningcited by 321
- 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 227
- 2020Learnable Uncertainty under Laplace Approximationscited by 29
- 2024Calibrated Uncertainty Quantification for Operator Learning via Conformal Predictioncited by 25
- 2022Approximate Bayesian Neural Operators: Uncertainty Quantification for Parametric PDEscited by 24
- 2025Position: Epistemic uncertainty estimation methods are fundamentally incompletecited by 8
- 2025Light-Weight Diffusion Multiplier and Uncertainty Quantification for Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.