mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EngramRAG: Dynamic Usage-Weighted Topology and Synaptic Consolidation for Multi-Hop Agentic Memory

arXiv 2609.32049 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2026cs.AI cs.CL cs.IRcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent memory systems

Abstract (arXiv)

As autonomous LLM agents are deployed across multi-session environments, conventional memory architectures suffer from Associative Blindness (inability to traverse multi-hop relational dependencies), Scaffolding Amnesia (temporal decay evicting core persona invariants), and Static Topology Stagnation (immutable graphs ignoring usage dynamics). Grounded in Complementary Learning Systems (CLS) principles, we propose EngramRAG, an adaptive memory architecture coupling a low-latency Waking State reflex with an asynchronous background Dreaming State consolidation cycle. EngramRAG introduces: (1) Usage-Modulated Personalized PageRank (U-PPR), where transition probabilities adapt via Hebbian plasticity to promote persistent entities into high-centrality Epistemic Macro-Hubs; (2) Consolidation-Activated Topology Decay (CATD), which scales retention half-life by topological load-bearing weight rather than wall-clock recency, protected by a cold-start grace period (N_grace >= 4); (3) Directed SUPERSEDES DAG filtering to suppress obsolete state during fact mutations; and (4) Triple-source hybrid retrieval fusing dense vectors, BM25, and U-PPR via dynamic Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF). Evaluating on all 1,982 QA pairs across 10 long-term conversations in the LoCoMo benchmark, EngramRAG achieves +38.9% relative improvement in Recall@5 (53.21% vs. 38.29%, p < 0.001) and +43.1% in MRR (0.4203 vs. 0.2937) over dense vector RAG, significantly outperforming Okapi BM25 (48.66%) and isolated static graph retrieval (8.50%). On temporal reasoning, EngramRAG reaches 62.33% Recall@5 (+16.67 points over dense vectors). In controlled mutation tests, SUPERSEDES suppresses split-brain hallucinations from 70.0% to 0.0%, while 90-day simulations show 100.0% scaffolding retention under a 26.21ms interactive retrieval reflex.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.

Builds on

6 of 12 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory28 Apr
  2. 2024Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agents27 Feb

Other references · 4

  1. 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,411
  2. 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,295
  3. 2024LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memorycited by 656
  4. 2024HippoRAG: Neurobiologically Inspired Long-Term Memory for Large Language Modelscited by 273

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026All-Mem: Agentic Lifelong Memory via Dynamic Topology Evolution
  2. 2026Rethinking Memory as Continuously Evolving Connectivity
  3. 2026Dual-Layer Agentic Memory with Fast Write Routing and Slow Consolidation
  4. 2026Human-Inspired Memory Architecture for LLM Agents
  5. 2026Hippocampus: An Efficient and Scalable Memory Module for Agentic AI
  6. 2026RaMem: Contextual Reinstatement for Long-term Agentic Memory
  7. 2026Governing Evolving Memory in LLM Agents: Risks, Mechanisms, and the Stability and Safety Governed Memory (SSGM) Framework
  8. 2026LifeFuse-Mem: Lifecycle-Aware State Fusion Against Temporary Overwriting for Long-Term Memory