mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Transformer MLP Gate Thresholds Are Couplings to a Carried Reference Direction

arXiv 2609.31956 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2026cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The corpus-mean direction of a transformer's residual stream is a component shared across all inputs, and is commonly removed by mean-centering before representational analysis. We present evidence that it is a functional component: the reference against which the MLP gate population sets its operating point. In Phi-2, an exact decomposition of resting gate pre-activations shows that at mid-stack layers the resting inhibition of >99.9% of gates is carried by the coupling w · bL to the carried mean direction, at 48-56× the explicit bias parameter, and the coupling is direction-specific: a random direction at matched norm orders the population's firing rates at Spearman ρ ≤ 0.09 where the reference reaches 0.95. (That 0.95 is near-tautological on its own; the paper derives its null.) Causally, removing the stream's projection on the reference multiplies above-threshold firing by about 9×, dose-monotonically, at 23-59× a norm-matched control; a random-initialised twin is flat, and replacement tests show that the direction carries the function and the magnitude does not. A direction-matched control makes the same point: noise injected along the reference costs 8-42× the same energy along a random direction. The decomposition replicates on four further families spanning both gate types (GELU with an explicit gate bias, bias-free SwiGLU), and the dose-response on two of them. Across an eight-model scan the mechanism is present in every GELU and SiLU family and absent only in OPT, where an opposing LayerNorm bias cancels the carried reference. Gate thresholds are implemented as couplings to a constant the network builds for the distribution it is reading, with the bias parameters contributing little; how much of that constant is carried in the stream and how much in parameters depends on the architecture.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.

Builds on

30 of 35 references.

References · 30

  1. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  2. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  3. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
  4. 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,186
  5. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  6. 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 964
  7. 2024TinyLlama: An Open-Source Small Language Modelcited by 618
  8. 2025SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Modelcited by 335
  9. 2024Massive Activations in Large Language Modelscited by 294
  10. 2021All Bark and No Bite: Rogue Dimensions in Transformer Language Models Obscure Representational Qualitycited by 156
  11. 2022The Lazy Neuron Phenomenon: On Emergence of Activation Sparsity in Transformerscited by 122
  12. 2021BERT Busters: Outlier Dimensions that Disrupt Transformerscited by 112
18 more
  1. 2022Outliers Dimensions that Disrupt Transformers Are Driven by Frequencycited by 55
  2. 2025Attention Sinks and Compression Valleys in LLMs are Two Sides of the Same Coincited by 52
  3. 2026The Spike, the Sparse and the Sink: Anatomy of Massive Activations and Attention Sinkscited by 27
  4. 2026A Unified View of Attention and Residual Sinks: Outlier-Driven Rescaling is Essential for Transformer Trainingcited by 23
  5. 2025Interpreting the Repeated Token Phenomenon in Large Language Modelscited by 16
  6. 2025A Refined Analysis of Massive Activations in LLMscited by 12
  7. 2025Hidden Dynamics of Massive Activations in Transformer Trainingcited by 10
  8. 2026Steered LLM Activations are Non-Surjectivecited by 8
  9. 2025Universal Properties of Activation Sparsity in Modern Large Language Modelscited by 7
  10. 2025Not a nuisance but a useful heuristic: Outlier dimensions favor frequent tokens in language modelscited by 3
  11. 2026A Single Layer to Explain Them All:Understanding Massive Activations in Large Language Modelscited by 2
  12. 2026On the Relationship Between Activation Outliers and Feature Death in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 2
  13. 2026Massive Spikes in LLMs are Bias Vectors: Mechanistic Uncovering and Spike-Free Quantizationcited by 2
  14. 2025Understanding Gated Neurons in Transformers from Their Input-Output Functionalitycited by 1
  15. 2026The Curse and Blessing of Mean Bias in FP4-Quantized LLM Trainingcited by 1
  16. 2026The Discrete Charm of the MLP: Binary Routing of Continuous Signals in Transformer Feed-Forward Layerscited by 1
  17. 2026Bug or Feature2: Weight Drift, Activation Sparsity and Spikescited by 1
  18. 2026Comparing Linear Probes with Mahalanobis Cosine Similaritycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.