mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Massive Spikes in LLMs are Bias Vectors: Mechanistic Uncovering and Spike-Free Quantization

arXiv 2606.02288 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Massive activation spikes in Large Language Models (LLMs) severely degrade quantization by stretching dynamic ranges. While prior hypotheses characterize these as high-level scalar biases, we argue that they are merely the scalar intermediates of rigid, structural vector biases in the spike-carrying tokens. We show that these tokens converge to constant vectors after normalization that drive the attention sink and value-state drain mechanisms. We geometrically substantiate this by analyzing the coordination of projection weights: WK contrastively amplifies the vector, WQ aligns semantic tokens toward it, and WV projects it into the spectral null-space. Furthermore, we reveal that the model actively preserves these structural biases against Rotary Positional Embedding (RoPE) perturbations by localizing them in "zones of rotational stability" utilizing low-frequency bands and coherent channel pairs. Leveraging this, we propose INSERTQUANT, a post-training quantization (PTQ) framework that clamps spikes and restores their function via pre-computed template vectors. This renders activations strictly spike-free, enabling robust low-bit quantization with high fidelity. INSERTQUANT achieves parity with state-of-the-art per-tensor quantization methods on LLMs and uniquely generalizes beyond text to other modalities such as ViTs.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

Builds on

25 of 40 references.

References · 25

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  4. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  5. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
  6. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  7. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  8. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  9. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
  10. 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,186
  11. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  12. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
13 more
  1. 2024QuaRot: Outlier-Free 4-Bit Inference in Rotated LLMscited by 634
  2. 2023Model Tells You What to Discard: Adaptive KV Cache Compression for LLMscited by 474
  3. 2024When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical Viewcited by 208
  4. 2024DuQuant: Distributing Outliers via Dual Transformation Makes Stronger Quantized LLMscited by 167
  5. 2023Quantizable Transformers: Removing Outliers by Helping Attention Heads Do Nothingcited by 151
  6. 2025Why do LLMs attend to the first token?cited by 127
  7. 2024Unveiling and Harnessing Hidden Attention Sinks: Enhancing Large Language Models without Training through Attention Calibrationcited by 74
  8. 2024Spectral Filters, Dark Signals, and Attention Sinkscited by 56
  9. 2024Active-Dormant Attention Heads: Mechanistically Demystifying Extreme-Token Phenomena in LLMscited by 56
  10. 2024Prefixing Attention Sinks can Mitigate Activation Outliers for Large Language Model Quantizationcited by 33
  11. 2025What are you sinking? A geometric approach on attention sinkcited by 28
  12. 2026The Spike, the Sparse and the Sink: Anatomy of Massive Activations and Attention Sinkscited by 27
  13. 2024Mitigating Quantization Errors Due to Activation Spikes in GLU-Based LLMscited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Refined Analysis of Massive Activations in LLMs
  2. 2025Precision Where It Matters: A Novel Spike Aware Mixed-Precision Quantization Strategy for LLaMA-based Language Models
  3. 2026The Curse and Blessing of Mean Bias in FP4-Quantized LLM Training
  4. 2026Measuring Maximum Activations in Open Large Language Models
  5. 2026QuantaSpike: Short-Window Spike-Driven Quantization for Large Language Models
  6. 2025Why Do Some Inputs Break Low-Bit LLM Quantization?
  7. 2026Understanding LLM Quantization through Activation-Guided Compensation and Orthogonal Residuals
  8. 2026Spike-driven Large Language Model