mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PEEL-DDPM: Physics-Enabled Evidential Learning for the Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model

arXiv 2609.31742 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Inverse problems and image restoration also fits: Diffusion foundations and sampling

Abstract (arXiv)

Normal-inverse-gamma (NIG) regression is not identifiable from its marginal Student-t likelihood: three combinations of four NIG parameters are determined, leaving one degree of freedom. We introduce PEEL-DDPM, a physics-enabled evidential learning framework for denoising diffusion probabilistic models. A measurement-conditioned DDPM is first trained with epsilon-MSE and then frozen. Its complete reverse trajectory produces a reconstruction, whose residual from the known training object is modeled by a final-image evidential network. The network learns only the identifiable Student-t coordinates, while repeated scanner-noise realizations and repeated diffusion trajectories provide a nested Monte Carlo estimate of final-image aleatoric variance, separated into scanner-induced and sampler-induced components. This measured variance resolves the remaining NIG ambiguity and yields a decomposition of predictive uncertainty into measurement, diffusion, and epistemic terms. The method uses sequential training without a cross-loss weighting coefficient. In a feasibility study on eight held-out objects, empirical central-interval coverages were 49.3%, 80.3%, 90.1%, and 95.6% for nominal 50%, 80%, 90%, and 95% intervals. The mean squared residual was 0.967 times the mean predicted variance, and a single-image aleatoric head achieved pooled Spearman correlation 0.785 against an independent nested reference. Across five dose levels, scanner-induced variance showed a log-log dose slope of -1.15, whereas sampler-induced variance remained nearly dose independent with slope -0.01. These results support PEEL-DDPM as a practical route to identifiable and physically interpretable uncertainty quantification in diffusion-based image reconstruction.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Inverse problems and image restoration, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 8 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2026.

Builds on

8 of 8 references.

References · 8

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
  3. 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 3,736
  4. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
  5. 2019Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 354
  6. 2022The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 40
  7. 2026ELVAE: Evidential Learning-Based Variational Autoencoder for Uncertainty-Aware Generationcited by 3
  8. 2026PEEL: Physics-Enabled Evidential Learning for Identifiable Uncertainty in CT Imagingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Divide-and-Conquer Posterior Sampling for Denoising Diffusion Priors
  2. 2024Learning Diffusion Model from Noisy Measurement using Principled Expectation-Maximization Method
  3. 2023Score-Based Diffusion Models as Principled Priors for Inverse Imaging
  4. 2026Diffusion Epistemic Uncertainty with Asymmetric Learning for Diffusion-Generated Image Detection
  5. 2026Posterior Information Dynamics of Diffusion Models for Linear Inverse Problems
  6. 2023ShiftDDPMs: Exploring Conditional Diffusion Models by Shifting Diffusion Trajectories
  7. 2025A Mixture-Based Framework for Guiding Diffusion Models
  8. 2026PILD: Physics-Informed Learning via Diffusion