PEEL-DDPM: Physics-Enabled Evidential Learning for the Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model
On the map: Diffusion models → Inverse problems and image restoration also fits: Diffusion foundations and sampling
Abstract (arXiv)
Normal-inverse-gamma (NIG) regression is not identifiable from its marginal Student-t likelihood: three combinations of four NIG parameters are determined, leaving one degree of freedom. We introduce PEEL-DDPM, a physics-enabled evidential learning framework for denoising diffusion probabilistic models. A measurement-conditioned DDPM is first trained with epsilon-MSE and then frozen. Its complete reverse trajectory produces a reconstruction, whose residual from the known training object is modeled by a final-image evidential network. The network learns only the identifiable Student-t coordinates, while repeated scanner-noise realizations and repeated diffusion trajectories provide a nested Monte Carlo estimate of final-image aleatoric variance, separated into scanner-induced and sampler-induced components. This measured variance resolves the remaining NIG ambiguity and yields a decomposition of predictive uncertainty into measurement, diffusion, and epistemic terms. The method uses sequential training without a cross-loss weighting coefficient. In a feasibility study on eight held-out objects, empirical central-interval coverages were 49.3%, 80.3%, 90.1%, and 95.6% for nominal 50%, 80%, 90%, and 95% intervals. The mean squared residual was 0.967 times the mean predicted variance, and a single-image aleatoric head achieved pooled Spearman correlation 0.785 against an independent nested reference. Across five dose levels, scanner-induced variance showed a log-log dose slope of -1.15, whereas sampler-induced variance remained nearly dose independent with slope -0.01. These results support PEEL-DDPM as a practical route to identifiable and physically interpretable uncertainty quantification in diffusion-based image reconstruction.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Inverse problems and image restoration, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 8 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2026.
Builds on
8 of 8 references.
References · 8
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
- 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 3,736
- 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
- 2019Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 354
- 2022The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 40
- 2026ELVAE: Evidential Learning-Based Variational Autoencoder for Uncertainty-Aware Generationcited by 3
- 2026PEEL: Physics-Enabled Evidential Learning for Identifiable Uncertainty in CT Imagingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Divide-and-Conquer Posterior Sampling for Denoising Diffusion Priors
- 2024Learning Diffusion Model from Noisy Measurement using Principled Expectation-Maximization Method
- 2023Score-Based Diffusion Models as Principled Priors for Inverse Imaging
- 2026Diffusion Epistemic Uncertainty with Asymmetric Learning for Diffusion-Generated Image Detection
- 2026Posterior Information Dynamics of Diffusion Models for Linear Inverse Problems
- 2023ShiftDDPMs: Exploring Conditional Diffusion Models by Shifting Diffusion Trajectories
- 2025A Mixture-Based Framework for Guiding Diffusion Models
- 2026PILD: Physics-Informed Learning via Diffusion