ELVAE: Evidential Learning-Based Variational Autoencoder for Uncertainty-Aware Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
ELVAE places an input-dependent normal--inverse-gamma (NIG) hierarchy at each VAE latent coordinate, separating location uncertainty uepi=β/[nu(α-1)] from conditional variability uvar=β/(α-1). The marginalized latent law, however, identifies only the three quotient coordinates (γ,α,c) with c=β(1+1/nu); reconstruction is blind to one (nu,β) fiber direction. A companion theoretical analysis shows that the complete NIG prior and forward KL select a unique prior-relative canonical representative on each fiber, so canonical inverse allocation is not a fourth independent information channel. Empirically, trained inverse evidence 1/nu remains the strongest sensitivity-ranking score. At τepi=1, the three-seed mean high/low-uepi semantic-transition ratios are 1.98 on MNIST and 1.66 on Fashion-MNIST, falling to 1.33 and 1.16 under scale-matched controls. In the 20-draw MNIST component study with equal per-anchor perturbation energy, 1/nu gives high/low ratios 1.69 and 1.65 under the uepi and uvar fields and 1.69 (95% interval 1.45--1.97) under a geometry-free isotropic field, whereas uvar reverses the isotropic ordering to 0.76. Under the experimental prior, canonical 1/nucan is a strictly increasing transform of T=c/[α(γ2+2)] and is bounded above by 3+√10. Thus ELVAE exposes a controllable sensitivity mechanism whose trained four-output realization is operationally informative, while the exact reconstruction-visible information remains three-dimensional and baseline image quality is a separate question.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.
Builds on
16 of 28 references.
References · 16
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
- 2019Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 354
- 2020Posterior Network: Uncertainty Estimation without OOD Samples via Density-Based Pseudo-Countscited by 163
- 2021Prior and Posterior Networks: A Survey on Evidential Deep Learning Methods For Uncertainty Estimationcited by 71
- 2022Pitfalls of Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification through Loss Minimisationcited by 65
- 2022The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 40
- 2023t3-Variational Autoencoder: Learning Heavy-tailed Data with Student's t and Power Divergencecited by 17
4 more
- 2023EdVAE: Mitigating Codebook Collapse with Evidential Discrete Variational Autoencoderscited by 16
- 2020Evidential Sparsification of Multimodal Latent Spaces in Conditional Variational Autoencoderscited by 15
- 2020Variational auto-encoders with Student's t-priorcited by 9
- 2024Remedying uncertainty representations in visual inference through Explaining-Away Variational Autoencoderscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.