mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ELVAE: Evidential Learning-Based Variational Autoencoder for Uncertainty-Aware Generation

arXiv 2608.10398 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

ELVAE places an input-dependent normal--inverse-gamma (NIG) hierarchy at each VAE latent coordinate, separating location uncertainty uepi=β/[nu(α-1)] from conditional variability uvar=β/(α-1). The marginalized latent law, however, identifies only the three quotient coordinates (γ,α,c) with c=β(1+1/nu); reconstruction is blind to one (nu,β) fiber direction. A companion theoretical analysis shows that the complete NIG prior and forward KL select a unique prior-relative canonical representative on each fiber, so canonical inverse allocation is not a fourth independent information channel. Empirically, trained inverse evidence 1/nu remains the strongest sensitivity-ranking score. At τepi=1, the three-seed mean high/low-uepi semantic-transition ratios are 1.98 on MNIST and 1.66 on Fashion-MNIST, falling to 1.33 and 1.16 under scale-matched controls. In the 20-draw MNIST component study with equal per-anchor perturbation energy, 1/nu gives high/low ratios 1.69 and 1.65 under the uepi and uvar fields and 1.69 (95% interval 1.45--1.97) under a geometry-free isotropic field, whereas uvar reverses the isotropic ordering to 0.76. Under the experimental prior, canonical 1/nucan is a strictly increasing transform of T=c/[α(γ2+2)] and is bounded above by 3+√10. Thus ELVAE exposes a controllable sensitivity mechanism whose trained four-output realization is operationally informative, while the exact reconstruction-visible information remains three-dimensional and baseline image quality is a separate question.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.

Builds on

16 of 28 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  3. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  4. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  5. 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
  6. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
  7. 2019Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 354
  8. 2020Posterior Network: Uncertainty Estimation without OOD Samples via Density-Based Pseudo-Countscited by 163
  9. 2021Prior and Posterior Networks: A Survey on Evidential Deep Learning Methods For Uncertainty Estimationcited by 71
  10. 2022Pitfalls of Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification through Loss Minimisationcited by 65
  11. 2022The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 40
  12. 2023t3-Variational Autoencoder: Learning Heavy-tailed Data with Student's t and Power Divergencecited by 17
4 more
  1. 2023EdVAE: Mitigating Codebook Collapse with Evidential Discrete Variational Autoencoderscited by 16
  2. 2020Evidential Sparsification of Multimodal Latent Spaces in Conditional Variational Autoencoderscited by 15
  3. 2020Variational auto-encoders with Student's t-priorcited by 9
  4. 2024Remedying uncertainty representations in visual inference through Explaining-Away Variational Autoencoderscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.