mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving Visual Sensitivity of LLMs on Multimodal Machine Translation with Metric-based Loss Weighting

arXiv 2609.31169 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal Machine Translation aims to incorporate additional signal from non-textual modalities to improve translations by resolving ambiguities. While models, through multimodal fusion, are able to accept images related to the source text, they can ignore this information. Therefore, increasing their visual sensitivity remains an active research area. In this work, we introduce a training method, Metric-based Loss Weighting, that improves visual grounding of translations by increasing the loss function for tokens that benefit from the accompanying image. We identify these tokens using the Point-wise Cross-mutual Information (PCXMI) metric, which compares the model's output probabilities with and without visual context. We introduce a Congruency-based PCXMI metric and experimentally show that both metrics working in combination yield the best results. We evaluate our method by fine-tuning three pretrained Multimodal Large Language Models on the task of Image-guided Machine Translation for three language directions. Metric-based Loss Weighting outperforms other tested methods on the CoMMuTE contrastive dataset, improving accuracy by up to more than 7 percentage points compared to standard fine-tuning, while maintaining strong general translation performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.

Builds on

28 of 54 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  4. 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,035
  5. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  6. 2016Multi30K: Multilingual English-German Image Descriptionscited by 250
  7. 2018Achieving Human Parity on Automatic Chinese to English News Translationcited by 119
  8. 2017Findings of the Second Shared Task on Multimodal Machine Translation and Multilingual Image Descriptioncited by 76
  9. 2022Democratizing Neural Machine Translation with OPUS-MTcited by 58
  10. 2019Probing the Need for Visual Context in Multimodal Machine Translationcited by 54
  11. 2020A Novel Graph-based Multi-modal Fusion Encoder for Neural Machine Translationcited by 51
  12. 2021Measuring and Increasing Context Usage in Context-Aware Machine Translationcited by 48
16 more
  1. 2021Good for Misconceived Reasons: An Empirical Revisiting on the Need for Visual Context in Multimodal Machine Translationcited by 44
  2. 2021When Does Translation Require Context? A Data-driven, Multilingual Explorationcited by 36
  3. 2022On Vision Features in Multimodal Machine Translationcited by 31
  4. 2019Multimodal Machine Translation through Visuals and Speechcited by 29
  5. 2022VALHALLA: Visual Hallucination for Machine Translationcited by 27
  6. 2022Neural Machine Translation with Phrase-Level Universal Visual Representationscited by 26
  7. 2022Tackling Ambiguity with Images: Improved Multimodal Machine Translation and Contrastive Evaluationcited by 26
  8. 2020Generative Imagination Elevates Machine Translationcited by 22
  9. 2021Vision Matters When It Should: Sanity Checking Multimodal Machine Translation Modelscited by 21
  10. 2022LVP-M3: Language-aware Visual Prompt for Multilingual Multimodal Machine Translationcited by 21
  11. 2021Gumbel-Attention for Multi-modal Machine Translationcited by 20
  12. 2023CLIPTrans: Transferring Visual Knowledge with Pre-trained Models for Multimodal Machine Translationcited by 14
  13. 2022Beyond Triplet: Leveraging the Most Data for Multimodal Machine Translationcited by 7
  14. 2024Detecting Concrete Visual Tokens for Multimodal Machine Translationcited by 3
  15. 2025You Are What You Train: Effects of Data Composition on Training Context-aware Machine Translation Modelscited by 3
  16. 2025GIIFT: Graph-guided Inductive Image-free Multimodal Machine Translationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Visual Perception by Large Language Model's Weights
  2. 2026MMTIT-Bench: A Multilingual and Multi-Scenario Benchmark with Cognition-Perception-Reasoning Guided Text-Image Machine Translation
  3. 2026VIDA: A Dataset for Visually Dependent Ambiguity in Multimodal Machine Translation
  4. 2026Improving Visual Token Reduction via Rectifying Distortions for Efficient Multimodal LLM Inference
  5. 2025Vision-Grounded Machine Interpreting: Improving the Translation Process through Visual Cues
  6. 2024Instruction Tuning-free Visual Token Complement for Multimodal LLMs
  7. 2025Breaking Language Barriers in Visual Language Models via Multilingual Textual Regularization
  8. 2024Accelerating Pre-training of Multimodal LLMs via Chain-of-Sight