ConsultMind:Towards Automated Diagnostic Consultation via Uncertainty-Aware Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Clinical and biomedical applications
Abstract (arXiv)
Diagnostic consultation is an online sequential decision-making process in which clinicians gather evidence through patient interaction until a diagnosis is sufficiently supported. Automating this process requires adaptive inquiry and interpretable decisions. Bayesian networks offer a natural foundation by updating diagnostic posteriors as evidence accumulates, but their use in open-ended consultation raises two challenges: linking diagnostic hypotheses to potential inquiries and translating evolving posteriors into consultation decisions. We introduce AutoDisym, an automated pipeline that integrates diagnostic knowledge with heterogeneous diagnosis-labeled clinical narratives to construct a Disorder--Symptom Bayesian Network (DSBN). Building on the DSBN, we propose ConsultMind, an uncertainty-aware framework that updates disorder posteriors after each response and uses posterior uncertainty to guide inquiry and diagnosis. We evaluate both methods across psychiatry, respiratory medicine, fever clinics, and three public datasets. The results show that AutoDisym can automatically construct high-quality DSBNs and that ConsultMind consistently improves diagnostic performance and explanation soundness. For example, AutoDisym achieves macro-averaged F1 scores of 81.37 for canonical symptoms and 72.19 for manifestations using GPT-5.6-Sol. ConsultMind improves Top-1 and Top-3 diagnostic accuracy by up to 22.15 and 37.89 percentage points, respectively. Physician evaluation further shows that ConsultMind improves the quality of ranking explanations, differential diagnoses, and diagnosis rationales across LLMs of different scales. This work offers a promising approach to automatic diagnostic consultation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Clinical and biomedical applications, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 10 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.
Builds on
10 of 51 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025ClinicalGPT-R1: Pushing reasoning capability of generalist disease diagnosis with large language model13 Apr
- 2024HuatuoGPT-o1, Towards Medical Complex Reasoning with LLMs25 Dec
Other references · 8
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2024Towards Conversational Diagnostic AIcited by 79
- 2025The Dialogue That Heals: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Doctor Agents' Inquiry Capabilitycited by 10
- 2026MedConsultBench: A Full-Cycle, Fine-Grained, Process-Aware Benchmark for Medical Consultation Agentscited by 4
- 2026MeDxAgent: Multi-Agent Consultation for Interactive Medical Diagnosiscited by 4
- 2026Evaluating Large Language Models in Dynamic Clinical Decision-Making with Standardized Patient Casescited by 2
- 2026MentalHospital: A Virtual Environment for Evaluating Psychiatric Clinical Encounterscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026MIND: Unified Inquiry and Diagnosis RL with Criteria Grounded Clinical Supports for Psychiatric Consultation
- 2026SymptomWise: A Deterministic Reasoning Layer for Reliable and Efficient AI Systems
- 2026Strong Reasoning Isn't Enough: Evaluating Evidence Elicitation in Interactive Diagnosis
- 2026MedClarify: An information-seeking AI agent for medical diagnosis with case-specific follow-up questions
- 2024Beyond Direct Diagnosis: LLM-based Multi-Specialist Agent Consultation for Automatic Diagnosis
- 2026Towards Reliable Medical LLMs: Benchmarking and Enhancing Confidence Estimation of Large Language Models in Medical Consultation
- 2026CDEG: Learning Decision-Critical Evidence for Long-Horizon Diagnostic Agents
- 2026Improving Clinical Diagnosis with Counterfactual Multi-Agent Reasoning