mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

To Solve Bilevel Optimization with Nonconvex Lower Levels, We Need Second-Order Stationarity

arXiv 2609.30501 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although bilevel optimization (BLO) has emerged as a powerful framework for addressing many complex and nested machine learning problems in recent years, most existing studies are confined to the lower-level strongly convex (LLSC) or lower-level generally convex (LLGC) settings (i.e., the lower-level objective function is assumed to be, at least, convex). While the LLSC/LLGC assumptions render more tractable algorithmic design and theoretical analysis, they are too rigid to encompass many machine learning problems in practice. The limitations of LLSC/LLGC assumptions in BLO motivate us to investigate solving the BLO problem in the general lower-level nonconvex (LLNC) settings, which remains in its infancy. In the literature on LLNC-BLO, most of the existing works either require additional structures in the lower-level objective function for tractable theoretical analysis, or adopt the first-order stationarity reformulation as a lower-level surrogate problem, which is inherited from the LLSC/LLGC settings but could lose their effectiveness in the LLNC setting. To bridge this gap, we propose to reformulate the nonconvex lower-level problem using a second-order stationarity-based surrogate, the solution of which guarantees a local optimal solution at the lower level. Based on this reformulation, we propose the PROBE (Perturbed gradient algorithm for bilevel problem) and show that it overcomes the limitations of prior works by probing and escaping lower-level saddle points. We prove that PROBE achieves a finite-time convergence rate of O(T-2/5), where T denotes iterations. To our knowledge, this work is the first to establish the finite-time convergence for achieving lower-level second-order stationary solutions in general LLNC-BLO. Our experiments on both a large language model-based data curation task and a meta-learning task also show that PROBE outperforms SOTA methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2026.

Builds on

46 of 58 references.

References · 46

  1. 2018Bilevel Programming for Hyperparameter Optimization and Meta-Learningcited by 405
  2. 2023Fine-Tuning Language Models with Just Forward Passescited by 345
  3. 2014Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimizationcited by 289
  4. 2018SPIDER: Near-Optimal Non-Convex Optimization via Stochastic Path Integrated Differential Estimatorcited by 287
  5. 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 285
  6. 2015Escaping From Saddle Points --- Online Stochastic Gradient for Tensor Decompositioncited by 243
  7. 2018Approximation Methods for Bilevel Programmingcited by 236
  8. 2020Bilevel Optimization: Convergence Analysis and Enhanced Designcited by 222
  9. 2018Truncated Back-propagation for Bilevel Optimizationcited by 190
  10. 2021Investigating Bi-Level Optimization for Learning and Vision from a Unified Perspective: A Survey and Beyondcited by 153
  11. 2020A Two-Timescale Framework for Bilevel Optimization: Complexity Analysis and Application to Actor-Criticcited by 144
  12. 2023HelpSteer: Multi-attribute Helpfulness Dataset for SteerLMcited by 142
34 more
  1. 2016Matrix Completion has No Spurious Local Minimumcited by 125
  2. 2021Provably Faster Algorithms for Bilevel Optimizationcited by 106
  3. 2022A framework for bilevel optimization that enables stochastic and global variance reduction algorithmscited by 99
  4. 2016A Geometric Analysis of Phase Retrievalcited by 92
  5. 2023On Penalty-based Bilevel Gradient Descent Methodcited by 87
  6. 2016Global Optimality of Local Search for Low Rank Matrix Recoverycited by 82
  7. 2021Revisiting and Advancing Fast Adversarial Training Through The Lens of Bi-Level Optimizationcited by 76
  8. 2017Accelerated Gradient Descent Escapes Saddle Points Faster than Gradient Descentcited by 66
  9. 2024SEAL: Safety-enhanced Aligned LLM Fine-tuning via Bilevel Data Selectioncited by 64
  10. 2021Amortized Implicit Differentiation for Stochastic Bilevel Optimizationcited by 63
  11. 2023On Penalty Methods for Nonconvex Bilevel Optimization and First-Order Stochastic Approximationcited by 51
  12. 2023How Smooth Is Attention?cited by 44
  13. 2023An Introduction to Bi-level Optimization: Foundations and Applications in Signal Processing and Machine Learningcited by 41
  14. 2023On Finding Small Hyper-Gradients in Bilevel Optimization: Hardness Results and Improved Analysiscited by 39
  15. 2024ScaleBiO: Scalable Bilevel Optimization for LLM Data Reweightingcited by 37
  16. 2017Neon2: Finding Local Minima via First-Order Oraclescited by 36
  17. 2024Getting More Juice Out of the SFT Data: Reward Learning from Human Demonstration Improves SFT for LLM Alignmentcited by 32
  18. 2023Averaged Method of Multipliers for Bi-Level Optimization without Lower-Level Strong Convexitycited by 26
  19. 2022Efficiently Escaping Saddle Points in Bilevel Optimizationcited by 19
  20. 2022A Conditional Gradient-based Method for Simple Bilevel Optimization with Convex Lower-level Problemcited by 17
  21. 2023Near-Optimal Nonconvex-Strongly-Convex Bilevel Optimization with Fully First-Order Oraclescited by 17
  22. 2024Moreau Envelope for Nonconvex Bi-Level Optimization: A Single-loop and Hessian-free Solution Strategycited by 16
  23. 2023Contextual Stochastic Bilevel Optimizationcited by 14
  24. 2023Projection-Free Methods for Stochastic Simple Bilevel Optimization with Convex Lower-level Problemcited by 13
  25. 2021Escape saddle points by a simple gradient-descent based algorithmcited by 11
  26. 2019Efficiently avoiding saddle points with zero order methods: No gradients requiredcited by 10
  27. 2022Zeroth-Order Negative Curvature Finding: Escaping Saddle Points without Gradientscited by 6
  28. 2022Escaping saddle points in zeroth-order optimization: the power of two-point estimatorscited by 5
  29. 2023A Generalized Alternating Method for Bilevel Learning under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 5
  30. 2025A Correspondence-Driven Approach for Bilevel Decision-making with Nonconvex Lower-Level Problemscited by 3
  31. 2026Sample-Efficient Hypergradient Estimation for Decentralized Bi-Level Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  32. 2025A Discretization Approach for Bilevel Optimization with Low-Dimensional and Non-Convex Lower-Levelcited by 1
  33. 2026SUN-DSBO: A Structured Unified Framework for Nonconvex Decentralized Stochastic Bilevel Optimizationcited by 1
  34. 2026DUET: Decentralized Bilevel Optimization without Lower-Level Strong Convexitycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.