Reasoning-Preserving Fine-Tuning of Post-RL LLMs with Null-Basis LoRA
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning (RL)-based post-training has become an effective approach for eliciting reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs). However, adapting post-RL models to new knowledge domains or behaviors through subsequent supervised fine-tuning (SFT) can severely overwrite these capabilities. Existing approaches mitigate such forgetting through experience replay, specialized initialization, or constrained optimization using gradient projection, but either provide limited preservation or incur substantial training overhead. Our analysis shows that reasoning activations concentrate in low-dimensional subspaces, leaving substantial null-space capacity for adaptation, and that the corresponding approximate null spaces can be reliably estimated from a modest number of examples. Motivated by these observations, we propose Null-Basis Low-Rank Adaptation (NB-LoRA), a parameter-efficient method for adapting post-RL LLMs while preserving their acquired reasoning ability. We formulate reasoning retention as a layer-wise hidden-state preservation constraint and construct a fixed approximate null basis from reasoning activations. LoRA updates are then reparameterized through this basis, enforcing the preservation constraint throughout fine-tuning. Extensive experiments across multiple RL-trained LLMs and diverse downstream tasks show that NB-LoRA matches standard LoRA in adaptation performance, maintains reasoning accuracy near pre-fine-tuning levels, and generalizes this preservation to held-out reasoning benchmarks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 37 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2026.
Builds on
37 of 46 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Learning What Reinforcement Learning Can't: Interleaved Online Fine-Tuning for Hardest Questions9 Jun
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan
Other references · 35
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
23 more
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,140
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,074
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
- 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 701
- 2023ToolAlpaca: Generalized Tool Learning for Language Models with 3000 Simulated Casescited by 383
- 2019Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learningcited by 361
- 2023LLM-Adapters: An Adapter Family for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 317
- 2023Orthogonal Subspace Learning for Language Model Continual Learningcited by 296
- 2024ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuningcited by 236
- 2026Self-Distillation Enables Continual Learningcited by 212
- 2025RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Lesscited by 162
- 2019LAMOL: LAnguage MOdeling for Lifelong Language Learningcited by 156
- 2021Training Networks in Null Space of Feature Covariance for Continual Learningcited by 139
- 2024MiLoRA: Harnessing Minor Singular Components for Parameter-Efficient LLM Finetuningcited by 89
- 2025What Makes a Good Reasoning Chain? Uncovering Structural Patterns in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 21
- 2026LLM Reasoning as Trajectories: Step-Specific Representation Geometry and Correctness Signalscited by 18
- 2025Put the Space of LoRA Initialization to the Extreme to Preserve Pre-trained Knowledgecited by 14
- 2025On the Convergence Rate of LoRA Gradient Descentcited by 9
- 2025Merge before Forget: A Single LoRA Continual Learning via Continual Mergingcited by 9
- 2026On the Non-decoupling of Supervised Fine-tuning and Reinforcement Learning in Post-trainingcited by 6
- 2026Denser neq Better: Limits of On-Policy Self-Distillation for Continual Post-Trainingcited by 6
- 2025Federated Sketching LoRA: A Flexible Framework for Heterogeneous Collaborative Fine-Tuning of LLMscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Hybrid-LoRA: Bridging Full Fine-Tuning and Low-Rank Adaptation for Post-Training
- 2025Tina: Tiny Reasoning Models via LoRA
- 2026Geometry-Preserving Orthonormal Initialization for Low-Rank Adaptation in RLVR
- 2025A Comparative Analysis of LLM Adaptation: SFT, LoRA, and ICL in Data-Scarce Scenarios
- 2025Mitigating Forgetting Between Supervised and Reinforcement Learning Yields Stronger Reasoners
- 2025Step-wise Adaptive Integration of Supervised Fine-tuning and Reinforcement Learning for Task-Specific LLMs
- 2025LLM Post-Training: A Deep Dive into Reasoning Large Language Models
- 2025Beyond Two-Stage Training: Cooperative SFT and RL for LLM Reasoning