mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Extracting Arguments, Not Just Classifying Them: Instruction-Tuned LLMs for Generative Component Detection

arXiv 2609.24855 ↗First posted 21 Sep 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Argumentative component detection (ACD) is a core subtask of Argument(ation) Mining (AM) and one of its most challenging aspects, as it requires jointly delimiting argumentative spans and classifying them into components such as claims and premises. While research on this subtask remains relatively limited compared to other AM tasks, most existing approaches formulate it as a simplified sequence labeling problem, component classification, or a pipeline of component segmentation followed by classification. In this paper, we propose ITFACD, a novel approach based on instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) using compact instruction-based prompts, and reframe ACD as a language generation task, enabling arguments to be identified directly from plain text without relying on pre-segmented components. Experiments on standard benchmarks show that our approach achieves higher performance compared to state-of-the-art systems. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first attempts to fully model ACD as a generative task, highlighting the potential of instruction tuning for complex AM problems. Our code and the datasets used are openly available in the following GitHub repository.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2026.

Builds on

17 of 33 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
  4. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
  5. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 840
  6. 2023Grammar-Constrained Decoding for Structured NLP Tasks without Finetuningcited by 197
  7. 2016Parsing Argumentation Structures in Persuasive Essayscited by 101
  8. 2016Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discoursecited by 69
  9. 2023Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentationcited by 42
  10. 2017Neural End-to-End Learning for Computational Argumentation Miningcited by 41
  11. 2017Argument Mining with Structured SVMs and RNNscited by 37
  12. 2022Mining Legal Arguments in Court Decisionscited by 35
5 more
  1. 2024Can Large Language Models perform Relation-based Argument Mining?cited by 23
  2. 2025Constrained Discrete Diffusioncited by 17
  3. 2024Efficient argument classification with compact language models and ChatGPT-4 refinementscited by 5
  4. 2022Diversity Over Size: On the Effect of Sample and Topic Sizes for Topic-Dependent Argument Mining Datasetscited by 4
  5. 2026Argument Mining as a Text-to-Text Generation Taskcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.