Summarize, Judge, Refine: Decoupled Content Understanding and Policy Learning for Multimodal Content Moderation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Content moderation systems traditionally entangle multimodal understanding with policy-specific classification, requiring full pipeline retraining for every policy change and suffering from label scarcity since multimedia cannot be meaningfully augmented. We propose Summarize-Judge-Refine (SJR), a two-model architecture that decouples these concerns via a natural language interface: a multimodal Content Model produces structured text summaries, and a text-only Policy Model classifies them against policy definitions. An iterative co-training loop refines the Content Model via GRPO to produce policy-relevant summaries, while text-space augmentation generates adversarial summary variants---an augmentation pathway impossible on raw multimedia---enabling few-shot policy bootstrap. Every decision is grounded in a human-readable summary, providing interpretability as a structural byproduct. On misleading advertisement detection, SJR achieves +23.6% relative non-misleading F1 over a zero-shot chain-of-thought baseline, outperforming end-to-end SFT, STaR/RFT, and RLFT. Notably, a variant trained on zero real violating examples---with all positive-class data synthetically generated---matches the full-data model within 0.2% relative on violating F1, demonstrating that new policies can launch without any real violation data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.
Builds on
17 of 23 references.
References · 17
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 807
- 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 788
- 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 686
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 625
- 2020The Hateful Memes Challenge: Detecting Hate Speech in Multimodal Memescited by 490
- 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 439
- 2019Benchmarking Zero-shot Text Classification: Datasets, Evaluation and Entailment Approachcited by 308
- 2021Get Your Vitamin C! Robust Fact Verification with Contrastive Evidencecited by 225
5 more
- 2021Generating Datasets with Pretrained Language Modelscited by 193
- 2024Scaling Up LLM Reviews for Google Ads Content Moderationcited by 12
- 2019Detecting Cyberbullying and Cyberaggression in Social Mediacited by 11
- 2022Explainable Abuse Detection as Intent Classification and Slot Fillingcited by 11
- 2024Multimodal Clickbait Detection by De-confounding Biases Using Causal Representation Inferencecited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026BLM-Guard: Explainable Multimodal Ad Moderation with Chain-of-Thought and Policy-Aligned Rewards
- 2025SUMMA: A Multimodal Large Language Model for Advertisement Summarization
- 2026Open-Domain Safety Policy Construction
- 2025Scaling Reinforcement Learning for Content Moderation with Large Language Models
- 2025Towards Trustworthy Multimodal Moderation via Policy-Aligned Reasoning and Hierarchical Labeling
- 2025Policy-as-Prompt: Rethinking Content Moderation in the Age of Large Language Models
- 2024Moderator: Moderating Text-to-Image Diffusion Models through Fine-grained Context-based Policies
- 2026Can Foundation Models Moderate Online Content? Evaluating Instruction- vs. Example-Driven Policy Operationalization