Deep Reinforcement Learning with Buffered Quantile Objectives
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantile-based reinforcement learning provides an interpretable approach to risk-sensitive decision-making by optimizing a prescribed quantile of the cumulative-return distribution. Despite this appeal, learning under a point quantile objective is challenging: quantiles can change abruptly under small perturbations of the return distribution, and exact quantile-sensitive planning requires computationally demanding distributional optimization. Lower-buffered quantiles alleviate the former difficulty by averaging neighboring quantiles immediately below the target level, providing a smoother surrogate while preserving the underlying point-quantile objective. Existing methods based on this principle, however, remain model-based and rely on explicit return-law planning, limiting their applicability beyond small tabular problems. We develop Deep-BQRL, a model-free distributional reinforcement-learning framework that extends buffered-quantile learning to neural function approximation. The method learns conditional return quantiles directly from sampled transitions, constructs buffered action scores from the relevant region of the learned quantile function, and uses ensemble disagreement to guide exploration. An augmented input representation allows the learned policy to respond to trajectory information without explicitly reproducing the quantile-state recursion required by exact planning. Experiments on an asset-selling optimal-stopping problem and slippery FrozenLake compare Deep-BQRL with model-based UCB-BQRL and tabular PPO and TRPO implementations. In asset selling, Deep-BQRL attains smaller mean cumulative point-quantile policy gaps than PPO and TRPO at the reported target levels, while UCB-BQRL retains the smallest gaps. The learned stopping decisions also vary with the target quantile, providing an interpretable illustration of the method's risk-sensitive behavior.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 7 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2026.
Builds on
7 of 19 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning with Smoothed Quantile Objectives23 Aug
- 2025Optimistic Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Objectives12 Nov
Other references · 5
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 765
- 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 474
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Quantile Geometry Regularization for Distributional Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Quantile Q-Learning: Revisiting Offline Extreme Q-Learning with Quantile Regression
- 2024Tilted Quantile Gradient Updates for Quantile-Constrained Reinforcement Learning
- 2021Quantile Filtered Imitation Learning
- 2026Statistical Efficiency and Inference of Quantile Distributional Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Deep Distributional Learning with Non-crossing Quantile Network
- 2026Direct Soft-Policy Sampling via Langevin Dynamics
- 2026Quantile of Means: A Bonus-Free Ensemble Method for Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning