mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning with Smoothed Quantile Objectives

arXiv 2608.22227 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2026cs.LG math.OCcited by 1

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has achieved tremendous success in recent years. However, the classical foundations of RL do not account for the risk sensitivity of the objective function, which is critical in various fields, including healthcare, finance, etc. A popular approach to incorporate risk sensitivity is to optimize a specific quantile of the cumulative reward distribution. However, exact quantile objectives are non-smooth and can change abruptly under small perturbations of the return distribution, making them difficult to optimize reliably when the transition model must be learned from data. Motivated by this instability, we develop UCB-BQRL, a model-based optimistic learning algorithm that maintains confidence sets for the transition kernel and plans using a lower-buffered quantile criterion. The buffered criterion smooths the exact quantile objective by averaging nearby lower quantiles, thereby improving stability under transition-estimation error. To compute the buffered-quantile policy at each episode, we introduce EVI-BQ, an exact dynamic-programming procedure. We establish a high-probability regret bound for UCB-BQRL, which up to logarithmic factors scales as O(eτ/ρτ+H2√SAT), where ρτ is denoted as the root-level left-plateau threshold, which is a problem-dependent constant. Further, we establish an information-theoretic lower bound of Omega(H/ρτ√AT) for the regret of any algorithm dealing with a quantile objective function. Finally, we prove that the exact point-quantile evaluation and exact lower-buffered quantile evaluation are PP-hard under polynomial-time Turing reductions, even for a fixed policy in a two-state, one-action finite-horizon MDP.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 3 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2026.

Builds on

3 of 64 references.

References · 3

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2018Model-Ensemble Trust-Region Policy Optimizationcited by 219
  3. 2025EVT-Based Rate-Preserving Distributional Robustness for Tail Risk Functionalscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Optimistic Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Objectives
  2. 2024Tilted Quantile Gradient Updates for Quantile-Constrained Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2025Robust Bayesian Dynamic Programming for On-policy Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2024Pessimism Meets Risk: Risk-Sensitive Offline Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2025Tail Distribution of Regret in Optimistic Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2024A Reductions Approach to Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning with Optimized Certainty Equivalents
  7. 2025Safety-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Control via Risk-Sensitive Action-Value Iteration and Quantile Regression
  8. 2024Continuous-time Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learning via Quadratic Variation Penalty