mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CoLearn: An Agentic Tutor that Learns its Learner in a Human--AI Co-Learning Loop

arXiv 2609.21154 ↗First posted 17 Sep 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Educational agents and math problem solving also fits: Agent memory systems

Abstract (arXiv)

Good tutoring adapts to the individual: it tracks what a learner knows, notices why they go wrong, and asks the next question that will help most. Most deployed tutoring tools instead serve fixed item banks and treat a wrong answer as a single bit of signal. We present CoLearn, an interactive, agentic tutor that supports an iterative tutoring loop: the learner practises, and the system builds an evidence-grounded memory of the learner's mastery and misconceptions. This memory is updated as evidence accumulates and is used to generate the next personalised question. CoLearn has three components: (i) a persistent learner-state memory that updates per-topic mastery with a soft-evidence variant of Bayesian Knowledge Tracing, where a large language model acts as a continuous observation function; (ii) adaptive question generation that targets the learner's weakest topic and recurring misconceptions; and (iii) an evidence view that makes personalisation visible and testable through live progress visualisation and blind A/B comparison. In blind A/B evaluation, questions conditioned on this memory are preferred over non-personalised ones 68-69% of the time, and in persona simulations with hidden ground-truth mastery the agent's belief converges toward the learner's true mastery.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Educational agents and math problem solving, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.

Builds on

12 of 32 references.

References · 12

  1. 2015Deep Knowledge Tracingcited by 332
  2. 2020Context-Aware Attentive Knowledge Tracingcited by 174
  3. 2023MathDial: A Dialogue Tutoring Dataset with Rich Pedagogical Properties Grounded in Math Reasoning Problemscited by 131
  4. 2022The AI Teacher Test: Measuring the Pedagogical Ability of Blender and GPT-3 in Educational Dialoguescited by 79
  5. 2020Instructions and Guide for Diagnostic Questions: The NeurIPS 2020 Education Challengecited by 64
  6. 2023CLASS: A Design Framework for building Intelligent Tutoring Systems based on Learning Science principlescited by 48
  7. 2023Distilling ChatGPT for Explainable Automated Student Answer Assessmentcited by 14
  8. 2024Calibrating LLMs with Preference Optimization on Thought Trees for Generating Rationale in Science Question Scoringcited by 8
  9. 2025Two Heads Are Better Than One: Dual-Model Verbal Reflection at Inference-Timecited by 8
  10. 2024BIPED: Pedagogically Informed Tutoring System for ESL Educationcited by 7
  11. 2024An Automated Explainable Educational Assessment System Built on LLMscited by 5
  12. 2025LearnLens: LLM-Enabled Personalised, Curriculum-Grounded Feedback with Educators in the Loopcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026DeepTutor: Towards Agentic Personalized Tutoring
  2. 2022Towards Teachable Reasoning Systems: Using a Dynamic Memory of User Feedback for Continual System Improvement
  3. 2026ACE-TA: An Agentic Teaching Assistant for Grounded Q&A, Quiz Generation, and Code Tutoring
  4. 2025ALAS: Autonomous Learning Agent for Self-Updating Language Models
  5. 2025Socratic-Zero : Bootstrapping Reasoning via Data-Free Agent Co-evolution
  6. 2025TutorGym: A Testbed for Evaluating AI Agents as Tutors and Students
  7. 2026Catching The Correct Answer Trap: Characterising AI Tutor Blind Spots When Analysing Student Reasoning
  8. 2025Towards Continuous Intelligence Growth: Self-Training, Continual Learning, and Dual-Scale Memory in SuperIntelliAgent