mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Origin Is All You Need: Provenance-Aware Transformers for Structural Trust-Boundary Separation

arXiv 2609.21088 ↗First posted 17 Sep 2026cs.CRcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Prompt injection and agent security

Abstract (arXiv)

Indirect prompt injection (IPI) remains a central safety and security challenge for large language model (LLM) systems because standard transformers lack architectural notion of source authority. Retrieved documents, user inputs, and system instructions are all processed through the same undifferentiated attention mechanism, forcing the model to infer from wording alone what should be obeyed and what should be treated as data. We propose Provenance-Aware Transformers, a provenance-aware defense that makes application-supplied source labels actionable inside the model. Each input token is assigned a ring ID encoding its origin, and the model is augmented with origin embeddings, a learnable origin attention bias, and a learnable origin scale that preserves provenance under normalization. The resulting architecture enforces a structural boundary between authoritative and non-authoritative sources during generation. To instantiate this architecture on released pretrained models, we propose a two-stage fine-tuning pipeline to teach the model origin semantics and task behavior under ring constraints. Evaluation shows that Provenance-Aware Transformers maintain robust resistance to IPI both in-distribution and out-of-distribution while preserving utility comparable to the base pretrained model. More broadly, our work shows that exposing provenance as a first-class architectural signal can shift LLM safety alignment from brittle pattern matching toward explicit trust separation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt injection and agent security, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 28 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.

Builds on

28 of 53 references.

Closest ancestors · 15

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Attention is All You Need to Defend Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks in LLMs9 Dec
  2. 2025PromptLocate: Localizing Prompt Injection Attacks14 Oct
  3. 2025PromptSleuth: Detecting Prompt Injection via Semantic Intent Invariance28 Aug
  4. 2025PromptArmor: Simple yet Effective Prompt Injection Defenses21 Jul
  5. 2025DataSentinel: A Game-Theoretic Detection of Prompt Injection Attacks15 Apr
  6. 2025Defense against Prompt Injection Attacks via Mixture of Encodings10 Apr
  7. 2024Enhancing Prompt Injection Attacks to LLMs via Poisoning Alignment18 Oct
  8. 2024SecAlign: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Preference Optimization7 Oct
  9. 2024The Instruction Hierarchy: Training LLMs to Prioritize Privileged Instructions19 Apr
  10. 2024Neural Exec: Learning (and Learning from) Execution Triggers for Prompt Injection Attacks6 Mar
  11. 2024StruQ: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Structured Queries9 Feb
  12. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusal6 Feb
3 more
  1. 2023Jatmo: Prompt Injection Defense by Task-Specific Finetuning29 Dec
  2. 2023Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses19 Oct
  3. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection23 Feb

Other references · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  6. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
  7. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,207
  8. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
  9. 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 832
  10. 2024PoisonedRAG: Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Modelscited by 267
  11. 2024WildTeaming at Scale: From In-the-Wild Jailbreaks to (Adversarially) Safer Language Modelscited by 223
  12. 2024PLeak: Prompt Leaking Attacks against Large Language Model Applicationscited by 127
1 more
  1. 2024Can LLMs Separate Instructions From Data? And What Do We Even Mean By That?cited by 81

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026PACE: Provenance-Aware Capability Enforcement for Tool-Using LLM Agents
  2. 2025Can AI Keep a Secret? Contextual Integrity Verification: A Provable Security Architecture for LLMs
  3. 2026Memory Provenance Laundering in LLM Agents: A Non-Amplification Firewall for Persistent Memory
  4. 2026LTBD: Learnable Trust-Boundary Delimiters for Prompt Injection Defense
  5. 2026Composable Trust for Language Models: A proven boundary and a measured defense ↗
  6. 2026A Behavioral Fingerprint for Large Language Models: Provenance Tracking via Refusal Vectors
  7. 2026The Granularity Mismatch in Agent Security: Argument-Level Provenance Solves Enforcement and Isolates the LLM Reasoning Bottleneck
  8. 2026TokenPrint: A Calibrated Token-Space Fingerprint for Language-Model Provenance