TokenPrint: A Calibrated Token-Space Fingerprint for Language-Model Provenance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Establishing the provenance of a language model---including its base checkpoint and possible overlap in training distributions---is a governance challenge that metadata alone cannot resolve. We introduce a training-free fingerprint based on the top-k vocabulary projections of late hidden states elicited by 250 fixed knowledge probes, compared using Jaccard overlap over decoded token strings. We evaluate the method on 32 open-weight models from nine families (0.6B--32B) with documented relationships. (1)~A similarity ladder broadly follows model relatedness: independently trained models on identical data score 0.48 raw (0.35 vocabulary-corrected), followed by shared-base fine-tunes (0.39/0.33), same-developer relatives (0.38/0.28), and models with no documented relationship (0.22/0.17). This identical-data signal persists across three organizations, two tokenizer families, and two architecture classes, and emerges within the first 1% of training before measurable task competence, suggesting a contribution from shared training data beyond capability convergence. (2)~As a nearest-neighbor lineage-retrieval method, the fingerprint ranks the exact documented base among the top two candidates for all five R1 distillations (mean rank 1.8, MRR 0.60), including a math-specialized base not identifiable from coarse metadata. (3)~A depth ablation shows that lineage group discrimination strengthens toward the output distribution, with AUC increasing from 0.72 at quarter depth to 0.90 at the output; using only the top 5 output tokens retains AUC 0.87. (4)~The fingerprint remains stable under quantization, with Jaccard similarity of 0.92 under int8 and 0.82--0.85 under int4, compared with a maximum cross-model similarity of 0.81 in the calibration pool. We release the probes, code, and fingerprints.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2026.
Builds on
19 of 27 references.
References · 19
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2022GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Modelcited by 713
- 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 623
- 2024InternLM2 Technical Reportcited by 397
- 2023Cerebras-GPT: Open Compute-Optimal Language Models Trained on the Cerebras Wafer-Scale Clustercited by 109
- 2024PhyloLM : Inferring the Phylogeny of Large Language Models and Predicting their Performances in Benchmarkscited by 19
7 more
- 2025Can LLM Watermarks Robustly Prevent Unauthorized Knowledge Distillation?cited by 19
- 2025Gradient-Based Model Fingerprinting for LLM Similarity Detection and Family Classificationcited by 14
- 2025SeedPrints: Fingerprints Can Even Tell Which Seed Your Large Language Model Was Trained Fromcited by 10
- 2025Knowledge Distillation Detection for Open-weights Modelscited by 4
- 2025Detecting Distillation Data from Reasoning Modelscited by 4
- 2025LogitTrace: Detecting Benchmark Contamination via Layerwise Logit Trajectoriescited by 2
- 2026A Behavioral Fingerprint for Large Language Models: Provenance Tracking via Refusal Vectorscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026KinGuard: Hierarchical Kinship-Aware Fingerprinting to Defend Against Large Language Model Stealing ↗
- 2026AttnDiff: Attention-based Differential Fingerprinting for Large Language Models
- 2026DataDignity: Training Data Attribution for Large Language Models
- 2026OriginBlame: Record- and Token-Level Data Provenance for AI Training Datasets
- 2025The Token Tax: Systematic Bias in Multilingual Tokenization
- 2026Origin Is All You Need: Provenance-Aware Transformers for Structural Trust-Boundary Separation
- 2026Training Leaves Traces: Centered Residual Signatures for Language Model Lineage Verification
- 2026Where a Model Sends Its Own Repeated Token