Plan, Watch, Recover: A Benchmark and Architectures for Proactive Procedural Assistance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Proactive multimodal assistants must decide when guidance is needed and what to say, while tracking progress through extended procedures and helping users recover when they depart from the expected plan. Progress is limited by benchmarks that score isolated clips, cover narrow domains, or omit realistic deviations. We introduce EgoProactive, a smart-glasses dataset of procedures across four domains in which users commit step-level deviations and recover from them, paired with reference guidance. We combine it with five re-annotated egocentric and instructional datasets to form Pro2Bench, a cross-domain benchmark that scores intervention timing, procedure completion, and response quality. Zero-shot, no frontier or open-weight model completes more than 26% of a procedure's interventions before its first error. We propose PWR (Plan, Watch, Recover), which keeps an explicit plan state in the model's context and revises it after every intervention, including recovery steps after a deviation. Across three open-weight backbones, training on Pro2Bench without a plan barely changes performance, while adding the dynamic plan raises average procedure completion from 20% to 27% and improves turn-level decisions and response quality for every backbone. The gains hold on held-out datasets and on deviations never seen in training.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2026.
Builds on
10 of 26 references.
References · 10
- 2023Ego-Exo4D: Understanding Skilled Human Activity from First- and Third-Person Perspectivescited by 490
- 2025StreamBridge: Turning Your Offline Video Large Language Model into a Proactive Streaming Assistantcited by 63
- 2023IndustReal: A Dataset for Procedure Step Recognition Handling Execution Errors in Egocentric Videos in an Industrial-Like Settingcited by 48
- 2024PREGO: online mistake detection in PRocedural EGOcentric videoscited by 39
- 2023PALM: Predicting Actions through Language Modelscited by 29
- 2025Proactive Assistant Dialogue Generation from Streaming Egocentric Videoscited by 28
- 2024Differentiable Task Graph Learning: Procedural Activity Representation and Online Mistake Detection from Egocentric Videoscited by 26
- 2024Satori: Towards Proactive AR Assistant with Belief-Desire-Intention User Modelingcited by 25
- 2024PrISM-Observer: Intervention Agent to Help Users Perform Everyday Procedures Sensed using a Smartwatchcited by 11
- 2025Procedural Mistake Detection via Action Effect Modelingcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026PROVIA: Procedure State Tracking for Online Mistake Detection in Egocentric Videoscited by 1
- 2026I'll Keep an Ear Out: Teaching AudioLLMs Proactive Audio Assistancecited by 1
- 2026Human-Centric Intelligence in the Era of Foundation Models: A Surveycited by 0
- 2026From Seeing to Acting: Smart Glasses as First-Person Intelligence Platformscited by 0
- 2026INSPECT: Learning Robot View Selection from Assistant Usecited by 0
- 2026EMBER-Bench: Benchmarking Cross-Event Causal Memory in Long-Horizon Embodied Taskscited by 0
- 2026Improving Proactive AI Assistance with Hierarchical Procedural Understandingcited by 0
- 2026Improving Proactive AI Assistance with Hierarchical Procedural Understanding5 Oct 2026
- 2026EMBER-Bench: Benchmarking Cross-Event Causal Memory in Long-Horizon Embodied Tasks4 Oct 2026
- 2026I'll Keep an Ear Out: Teaching AudioLLMs Proactive Audio Assistance18 Sep 2026
- 2026PROVIA: Procedure State Tracking for Online Mistake Detection in Egocentric Videos17 Sep 2026
- 2026INSPECT: Learning Robot View Selection from Assistant Use17 Sep 2026
- 2026From Seeing to Acting: Smart Glasses as First-Person Intelligence Platforms25 Aug 2026
- 2026Human-Centric Intelligence in the Era of Foundation Models: A Survey18 Aug 2026