mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Re2A: Situated Conversational Recommendation via Rubric-based Preference Reasoning and Alignment

arXiv 2609.18249 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Real-world recommendation scenarios are commonly grounded in shared physical environments during user-recommender interactions. This motivates situated conversational recommendation (SCR), a complex task requiring recommender assistants to jointly reason over dialogue history, co-observed scenes, and in-scene item attributes. However, current approaches struggle with this setting due to two intertwined challenges: accurately understanding situated user preferences throughout the conversation and generating responses that simultaneously satisfy user needs and grounded situations. To this end, we propose Re2A, a framework that formulates SCR as a structured reason-then-align process. We introduce rubric-based preference reasoning, which uses automated rubrics to guide the model toward producing explicit preference states. Based on these states, we propose a preference-conditioned optimization to align response generation with dual objectives: user preference satisfaction and situation consistency. Extensive experiments on two SCR datasets demonstrate that Re2A consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, delivering more precise, context-aware conversational recommendations. Our code is available at https://github.com/DongdingLin/Re2A.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2026.

Builds on

21 of 34 references.

References · 21

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  4. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  5. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  6. 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,551
  7. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 615
  8. 2018Towards Deep Conversational Recommendationscited by 174
  9. 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offsetcited by 122
  10. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination in Large Language, Image, Video and Audio Foundation Modelscited by 98
  11. 2021SIMMC 2.0: A Task-oriented Dialog Dataset for Immersive Multimodal Conversationscited by 54
  12. 2024Evaluating Large Language Models as Generative User Simulators for Conversational Recommendationcited by 45
9 more
  1. 2024Core Knowledge Deficits in Multi-Modal Language Modelscited by 38
  2. 2020Situated and Interactive Multimodal Conversationscited by 35
  3. 2025MMRC: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Understanding Multimodal Large Language Model in Real-World Conversationcited by 28
  4. 2025Multimodal Inconsistency Reasoning (MMIR): A New Benchmark for Multimodal Reasoning Modelscited by 24
  5. 2024Fine-Tuning Language Models with Reward Learning on Policycited by 15
  6. 2025TRACE: Real-Time Multimodal Common Ground Tracking in Situated Collaborative Dialoguescited by 9
  7. 2024Muse: A Multimodal Conversational Recommendation Dataset with Scenario-Grounded User Profilescited by 8
  8. 2025ReGeS: Reciprocal Retrieval-Generation Synergy for Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 2
  9. 2026Where and What: Reasoning Dynamic and Implicit Preferences in Situated Conversational Recommendationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.