Re2A: Situated Conversational Recommendation via Rubric-based Preference Reasoning and Alignment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Real-world recommendation scenarios are commonly grounded in shared physical environments during user-recommender interactions. This motivates situated conversational recommendation (SCR), a complex task requiring recommender assistants to jointly reason over dialogue history, co-observed scenes, and in-scene item attributes. However, current approaches struggle with this setting due to two intertwined challenges: accurately understanding situated user preferences throughout the conversation and generating responses that simultaneously satisfy user needs and grounded situations. To this end, we propose Re2A, a framework that formulates SCR as a structured reason-then-align process. We introduce rubric-based preference reasoning, which uses automated rubrics to guide the model toward producing explicit preference states. Based on these states, we propose a preference-conditioned optimization to align response generation with dual objectives: user preference satisfaction and situation consistency. Extensive experiments on two SCR datasets demonstrate that Re2A consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, delivering more precise, context-aware conversational recommendations. Our code is available at https://github.com/DongdingLin/Re2A.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2026.
Builds on
21 of 34 references.
References · 21
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,551
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 615
- 2018Towards Deep Conversational Recommendationscited by 174
- 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offsetcited by 122
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination in Large Language, Image, Video and Audio Foundation Modelscited by 98
- 2021SIMMC 2.0: A Task-oriented Dialog Dataset for Immersive Multimodal Conversationscited by 54
- 2024Evaluating Large Language Models as Generative User Simulators for Conversational Recommendationcited by 45
9 more
- 2024Core Knowledge Deficits in Multi-Modal Language Modelscited by 38
- 2020Situated and Interactive Multimodal Conversationscited by 35
- 2025MMRC: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Understanding Multimodal Large Language Model in Real-World Conversationcited by 28
- 2025Multimodal Inconsistency Reasoning (MMIR): A New Benchmark for Multimodal Reasoning Modelscited by 24
- 2024Fine-Tuning Language Models with Reward Learning on Policycited by 15
- 2025TRACE: Real-Time Multimodal Common Ground Tracking in Situated Collaborative Dialoguescited by 9
- 2024Muse: A Multimodal Conversational Recommendation Dataset with Scenario-Grounded User Profilescited by 8
- 2025ReGeS: Reciprocal Retrieval-Generation Synergy for Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 2
- 2026Where and What: Reasoning Dynamic and Implicit Preferences in Situated Conversational Recommendationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.