Fenchel-Young Duality Gaps: Certified Early Stopping for Regularized Inverse Problems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study computable error bounds and certified early stopping for regularized inverse problems, where a data-fidelity term is traded against a regularizer. The analysis relies on an exact duality-gap identity that splits the total gap of F(Phiμ)+λ R(μ) into a data-fidelity Fenchel--Young loss and a regularizer Fenchel--Young loss, Delta(μ,h)=LF(Phiμparallel h)+λ LR(μparallelη),qquad η=-Phi^star h/λ, valid for any primal point μ and any dual point h. The data-fidelity term F is strictly convex, so wherever F^star is differentiable the loss LF(Phiμparallel h) is the Bregman divergence of~F between the prediction Phiμ and nabla F^star(h), and it vanishes exactly at Mirror Alignment h=nabla F(Phiμ). Evaluated at a dual-feasible point tilde h, the gap~Delta(μ,tilde h) is computable and oracle-free, meaning that it uses no knowledge of the solution, and it bounds the suboptimality of μ. Under the source condition, the same Fenchel--Young losses give a priori bounds on the estimation and prediction errors. Their scale is the irreducible model and noise error LF(Phiμ^starparallel h^star), which vanishes exactly when Mirror Alignment holds at the certificate. This gives an early-stopping rule: run the algorithm until the regularizer Fenchel--Young loss falls below a tolerance ε. A constructive version of the Bro ndsted--Rockafellar theorem then turns the current pair into an exact dual-feasible one, and this proxy lifts to an exact primal certificate. We build the proxy by a proximal step in the geometry of the fidelity, with Bregman kernel F^star and tilted by the prediction Phiμ: it recovers the Euclidean step of Carlier when F is the squared error, and it reduces the duality gap by the regularizer Fenchel--Young loss, up to a second-order remainder that vanishes in the quadratic case. Our running example is the Generalized Beurling--Lasso (GBL), where R is the total-variation norm on signed measures. It contains the classical Beurling--Lasso, obtained with the squared error, and also covers robust, logistic, entropic and inverse-optimal-transport losses. The same duality gap certifies deep-learning optimizers such as Lion-K and Muon, in their proximal form, as solvers of the regularized program. A companion paper by the same authors builds on these error bounds to establish exact support recovery for the GBL under a non-degenerate source condition.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2026.
Builds on
13 of 34 references.
References · 13
- 2018On the Global Convergence of Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Models using Optimal Transportcited by 426
- 2019Learning with Fenchel-Young Lossescited by 119
- 2025The Polar Express: Optimal Matrix Sign Methods and Their Application to the Muon Algorithmcited by 110
- 2023Lion Secretly Solves Constrained Optimization: As Lyapunov Predictscited by 51
- 2019Sparse Optimization on Measures with Over-parameterized Gradient Descentcited by 50
- 2018On Representer Theorems and Convex Regularizationcited by 24
- 2013Exact Support Recovery for Sparse Spikes Deconvolutioncited by 22
- 2018The Sliding Frank-Wolfe Algorithm and its Application to Super-Resolution Microscopycited by 16
- 2015The Alternating Descent Conditional Gradient Method for Sparse Inverse Problemscited by 11
- 2023FastPart: Over-Parameterized Stochastic Gradient Descent for Sparse optimisation on Measurescited by 3
- 2025Learning from samples: inverse problems over measurescited by 3
- 2021Towards Off-the-grid Algorithms for Total Variation Regularized Inverse Problemscited by 1
1 more
- 2024The Smoothed Duality Gap as a Stopping Criterioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.