mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Accurate, Scalable and Verifiable Protocol for Federated Differentially Private Averaging

arXiv 2006.07218 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2020cs.CR cs.DC cs.LGcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning from data owned by several parties, as in federated learning, raises challenges regarding the privacy guarantees provided to participants and the correctness of the computation in the presence of malicious parties. We tackle these challenges in the context of distributed averaging, an essential building block of federated learning algorithms. Our first contribution is a scalable protocol in which participants exchange correlated Gaussian noise along the edges of a network graph, complemented by independent noise added by each party. We analyze the differential privacy guarantees of our protocol and the impact of the graph topology under colluding malicious parties, showing that we can nearly match the utility of the trusted curator model even when each honest party communicates with only a logarithmic number of other parties chosen at random. This is in contrast with protocols in the local model of privacy (with lower utility) or based on secure aggregation (where all pairs of users need to exchange messages). Our second contribution enables users to prove the correctness of their computations without compromising the efficiency and privacy guarantees of the protocol. Our verification protocol relies on standard cryptographic primitives like commitment schemes and zero knowledge proofs.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 6; 2025: 9; 2026: 2.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Zero-Knowledge Proof-based Verifiable Decentralized Machine Learning in Communication Network: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 18
  2. 2024The Privacy Power of Correlated Noise in Decentralized Learningcited by 17
  3. 2025Towards Trustworthy Federated Learning with Untrusted Participantscited by 8
  4. 2024Differentially private and decentralized randomized power methodcited by 6
  5. 2024Low-Cost Privacy-Preserving Decentralized Learningcited by 4
  6. 2025Mitigating Privacy-Utility Trade-off in Decentralized Federated Learning via f-Differential Privacycited by 3
  7. 2023Secure and Fast Asynchronous Vertical Federated Learning via Cascaded Hybrid Optimizationcited by 2
  8. 2025Differential Privacy Analysis of Decentralized Gossip Averaging under Varying Threat Modelscited by 2
  9. 2025Tight Stability Bounds for Robust Distributed Learning: Byzantine Failures Hurt Generalization More than Data Poisoningcited by 2
  10. 2025Unified Privacy Guarantees for Decentralized Learning via Matrix Factorizationcited by 2
  11. 2023Balancing Privacy, Robustness, and Efficiency in Machine Learningcited by 1
  12. 2024On Using Secure Aggregation in Differentially Private Federated Learning with Multiple Local Stepscited by 1
8 more
  1. 2024Exposing the Vulnerability of Decentralized Learning to Membership Inference Attacks Through the Lens of Graph Mixingcited by 1
  2. 2025How to Securely Shuffle? A survey about Secure Shufflers for privacy-preserving computationscited by 1
  3. 2024SoK: Verifiable Cross-Silo FLcited by 0
  4. 2025Dropout-Robust Mechanisms for Differentially Private and Fully Decentralized Mean Estimationcited by 0
  5. 2025On Balancing Sparsity with Reliable Connectivity in Distributed Network Design with Random K-out Graphscited by 0
  6. 2025DP-Hype: Federated Differentially Private Hyperparameter Searchcited by 0
  7. 2026Accurate, private, secure, federated U-statistics with higher degreecited by 0
  8. 2026End-to-End Verifiable and Robust Federated Learningcited by 0