mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DynEoMT: Learning Object Dynamicity from Online Segmentation Queries

arXiv 2609.14466 ↗First posted 13 Sep 2026cs.CV cs.ROcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Video segmentation models recognize and track objects over time, but they do not indicate whether each segmented region moves independently of the observing camera. This dynamicity attribute cannot be inferred from semantics alone and is confounded by camera ego-motion. We introduce method, an online framework that augments query-based video segmentation with region-level dynamicity prediction. It jointly produces the original segmentation outputs and a dynamic or static state for each predicted region. At inference, DynEoMT uses only the current frame and propagated queries, without optical flow, depth, camera pose, previous RGB frames, or feature maps. Because established video segmentation benchmarks do not annotate this attribute, we also introduce a class-agnostic offline supervision pipeline using camera-compensated optical flow and confidence-aware temporal filtering. Across VIPSeg, OVIS, YouTube-VIS 2022, and VSPW, DynEoMT achieves balanced accuracies of 84.3, 68.0, 68.6, and 87.6, respectively, while largely preserving segmentation performance. These results show that segmentation-region dynamicity can be learned from propagated queries, enabling its online prediction without a dedicated motion-processing pipeline at inference. The complete code will be released as open source to enable full reproduction of the method and experiments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2026.

Builds on

29 of 36 references.

References · 29

  1. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  2. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  3. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  4. 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,863
  5. 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,415
  6. 2018Panoptic Segmentationcited by 802
  7. 2019Video Instance Segmentationcited by 393
  8. 2021Occluded Video Instance Segmentation: A Benchmarkcited by 154
  9. 2021Self-supervised Video Object Segmentation by Motion Groupingcited by 147
  10. 2020Video Panoptic Segmentationcited by 142
  11. 2018DynaSLAM: Tracking, Mapping and Inpainting in Dynamic Scenescited by 134
  12. 2022MinVIS: A Minimal Video Instance Segmentation Framework without Video-based Trainingcited by 94
17 more
  1. 2023DVIS: Decoupled Video Instance Segmentation Frameworkcited by 77
  2. 2021STEP: Segmenting and Tracking Every Pixelcited by 73
  3. 2025Your ViT is Secretly an Image Segmentation Modelcited by 63
  4. 2024MemFlow: Optical Flow Estimation and Prediction with Memorycited by 55
  5. 2021Learning to Segment Rigid Motions from Two Framescited by 46
  6. 2023DVIS++: Improved Decoupled Framework for Universal Video Segmentationcited by 46
  7. 2025Segment Any Motion in Videoscited by 35
  8. 2024Moving Object Segmentation: All You Need Is SAM (and Flow)cited by 30
  9. 2020EffiScene: Efficient Per-Pixel Rigidity Inference for Unsupervised Joint Learning of Optical Flow, Depth, Camera Pose and Motion Segmentationcited by 22
  10. 2024DVIS-DAQ: Improving Video Segmentation via Dynamic Anchor Queriescited by 22
  11. 2024RoMo: Robust Motion Segmentation Improves Structure from Motioncited by 20
  12. 2025Learning segmentation from point trajectoriescited by 15
  13. 2023InsPro: Propagating Instance Query and Proposal for Online Video Instance Segmentationcited by 13
  14. 2026VidEoMT: Your ViT is Secretly Also a Video Segmentation Modelcited by 8
  15. 2025Is Semantic SLAM Ready for Embedded Systems ? A Comparative Surveycited by 5
  16. 2026GeoMotion: Rethinking Motion Segmentation via Latent 4D Geometrycited by 2
  17. 2026GMOS: Grounding Moving Object Segmentation in 3D Space and Timecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.