Algorithmic Information Dynamics of Learning: A Certified, Differentiable Complexity Controller for Grokking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Algorithmic Information Dynamics (AID) studies systems by perturbing them and measuring changes in algorithmic complexity, but its usual estimator, the Block Decomposition Method, is piecewise constant, restricting the calculus to finite differences. We use KCDMsF, a certified, differentiable estimator, to bring the calculus into learning dynamics: grokking, where a complexity order parameter is known but has not been made to act. As a transient loss kick, the estimator becomes a controller that accelerates grokking in Levin's description-length--versus-time sense, within a data-dependent Occam boundary whose finite-size trend, fc~ln p/p, is consistent with a coupon-collector interpretation. Ablations show that a complexity gate matches a train-loss gate in rescuing failing seeds with 27% less intervention; among the tested signals, only map complexity marks the transition's completion; the certified prior and the per-parameter nabla K attribution are both fungible (a uniform-prior sensor makes bit-identical gate decisions, and random supports match nabla K-selected ones above a sparsity threshold); and direct field perturbation shows a nucleation-like response to the Occam field (no linear regime is resolved over the probed amplitudes, so these measurements do not justify a fluctuation--dissipation surrogate), with a finite-field response growing by orders of magnitude toward the phase-transition. These measurements account for the empirically tuned staircase: bang--bang pulses, stall-fired and released on yield, whose iteration plausibly builds the response it exploits. The kick transfers to sparse parity and to a transformer; a sustained weight-space loss fails. The algorithmic estimator's distinct contribution is timing (when to fire and when to release), not attribution.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2026.
Builds on
10 of 20 references.
References · 10
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
- 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
- 2022Towards Understanding Grokking: An Effective Theory of Representation Learningcited by 230
- 2022Hidden Progress in Deep Learning: SGD Learns Parities Near the Computational Limitcited by 187
- 2022Omnigrok: Grokking Beyond Algorithmic Datacited by 146
- 2023Explaining grokking through circuit efficiencycited by 111
- 2022The Slingshot Mechanism: An Empirical Study of Adaptive Optimizers and the Grokking Phenomenoncited by 94
- 2024Grokfast: Accelerated Grokking by Amplifying Slow Gradientscited by 41
- 2024The Complexity Dynamics of Grokkingcited by 22
- 2025Binarized Neural Networks Converge Toward Algorithmic Simplicity: Empirical Support for the Learning-as-Compression Hypothesiscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.