mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

WinSyn: An Automated Pipeline for Realistic Enterprise Question-Answering Evaluation

arXiv 2609.12171 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Agentic RAG, agents and memory

Abstract (arXiv)

Enterprise settings provide a challenging environment for question-answering agents, which often rely on Retrieval-Augmented Generation, Deep Research (DR), and related techniques. Much of this challenge comes from the complexity of enterprise data: information is often spread across evolving and potentially conflict- ing emails, chat messages, documents, and other artifacts. Existing benchmarks typically have limited real-world complexity, short-form responses, and unnatural queries, so they often fail to capture the challenges of enterprise settings. In this work, we introduce an automated pipeline for generating synthetic datasets of emails reflecting realistic workplace scenarios, along with long- and short-form questions and gold answers grounded in the data. Our method simulates long-running enterprise projects spanning several months and involving up to 25 interacting employees across multiple roles. The data emphasizes ambiguity, distributed information, and naturally occurring queries. To validate the pipeline, we evaluate few standard agentic baselines on our datasets using the latest frontier models. We find that aggregate scores averaged over all queries remain below 80% for each dataset, indicating significant room for improvement. These findings suggest that more work remains to be done for enterprise deployment and underscore the importance of realistic, high-complexity evaluation data for developing stronger real-world enterprise DR systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agentic RAG, agents and memory, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 11 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.

Builds on

11 of 32 references.

References · 11

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  3. 2024TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Taskscited by 306
  4. 2025CRMArena-Pro: Holistic Assessment of LLM Agents Across Diverse Business Scenarios and Interactionscited by 46
  5. 2026DeepSearchQA: Bridging the Comprehensiveness Gap for Deep Research Agentscited by 44
  6. 2026OfficeQA Pro: An Enterprise Benchmark for End-to-End Grounded Reasoningcited by 37
  7. 2025PRBench: Large-Scale Expert Rubrics for Evaluating High-Stakes Professional Reasoningcited by 29
  8. 2025Finding Flawed Fictions: Evaluating Complex Reasoning in Language Models via Plot Hole Detectioncited by 24
  9. 2025Benchmarking Deep Search over Heterogeneous Enterprise Datacited by 23
  10. 2025DRBench: A Realistic Benchmark for Enterprise Deep Researchcited by 19
  11. 2026DRACO: a Cross-Domain Benchmark for Deep Research Accuracy, Completeness, and Objectivitycited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Corpus2Skill: Distilling Enterprise Knowledge into Navigable Agent Skills for QA and RAG
  2. 2026EnterpriseRAG-Bench: A RAG Benchmark for Company Internal Knowledge
  3. 2026AgenticRAG: Agentic Retrieval for Enterprise Knowledge Bases
  4. 2026MeetBench-XL: Calibrated Multi-Dimensional Evaluation and Learned Dual-Policy Agents for Real-Time Meetings
  5. 2026A Multi-Agent Platform for Automated Enterprise Analytics and Insight Generation
  6. 2026SEGRA: A Structured Experience Guided Reasoning Agent for Property Graph Question Answering
  7. 2025Agent Bain vs. Agent McKinsey: A New Text-to-SQL Benchmark for the Business Domain
  8. 2026UniDataAgent: An Ontology-Grounded Agent for Enterprise Question-to-Report Automation