Characterizing Job Power Elasticity for Power-Flexible AI Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model (LLM) training is among the fastest-growing sources of electricity demand in modern data centers, and power availability is a primary bottleneck to continued AI infrastructure growth. Making the power consumption of these workloads flexible could unlock additional power for AI growth, limit increases in electricity prices, and improve the utilization of existing grid infrastructure. However, to realize this flexibility, we must first understand how the performance of training workloads changes when GPU power is reduced. This paper presents the first systematic characterization of job power elasticity (the sensitivity of throughput to power reductions) in LLM training. To quantify elasticity, we introduce the Power Flexibility Index (PFI), a normalized metric that quantifies the performance cost of power reductions and provides a control primitive for SLA-aware power flexibility. We collect data from 131 LLM training runs on H200 (plus 24 H200 validation runs and 34 matched H100 runs), including both dense and mixture-of-experts models, pretraining and fine-tuning tasks, and up to 32 GPUs. We find that LLM training jobs exhibit substantial but variable power elasticity, and we identify telemetry signals that predict PFI at runtime. Finally, we demonstrate that PFI-aware power allocation maximizes total tokens/second throughput under power constraints. Under a 30% power reduction, PFI-aware power allocation recovers ~1.5k tokens/s per job, 63% of the performance gap between an equal-weight allocation and an oracle with perfect information. Our results establish power elasticity as a measurable property of training jobs and provide a foundation for power-aware, grid-responsive AI infrastructure.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.
Builds on
18 of 36 references.
References · 18
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,611
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
- 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,829
- 2020GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Shardingcited by 1,601
- 2019ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Modelscited by 1,278
- 2023PyTorch FSDP: Experiences on Scaling Fully Sharded Data Parallelcited by 641
- 2022MegaBlocks: Efficient Sparse Training with Mixture-of-Expertscited by 204
- 2022Tutel: Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts at Scalecited by 199
- 2024DynamoLLM: Designing LLM Inference Clusters for Performance and Energy Efficiencycited by 106
- 2022Zeus: Understanding and Optimizing GPU Energy Consumption of DNN Trainingcited by 78
- 2024Characterization of Large Language Model Development in the Datacentercited by 46
6 more
- 2021Carbon-Aware Computing for Datacenterscited by 40
- 2025The ML.ENERGY Benchmark: Toward Automated Inference Energy Measurement and Optimizationcited by 31
- 2023Reducing Energy Bloat in Large Model Trainingcited by 22
- 2022Treehouse: A Case For Carbon-Aware Datacenter Softwarecited by 12
- 2024Sustainable Supercomputing for AI: GPU Power Capping at HPC Scalecited by 9
- 2023POLCA: Power Oversubscription in LLM Cloud Providerscited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Cutting AI Datacenter Energy with Reinforcement Learning: Measured Power Control of LLM Training from One GPU to the Fleet
- 2026PALS: Power-Aware LLM Serving for Mixture-of-Experts Models
- 2024Offline Energy-Optimal LLM Serving: Workload-Based Energy Models for LLM Inference on Heterogeneous Systems
- 2026Coordinated Cooling and Compute Management for AI Datacenters ↗
- 2026Characterizing Performance-Energy Trade-offs of Large Language Models in Multi-Request Workflows
- 2025Benchmarking Energy Efficiency of Large Language Models Using vLLM
- 2026PowerSlider: Exploiting Phase Asymmetry for LLM Serving under Demand Response
- 2026AI Hardware Accelerators for Large Language Models: Architectures and the Memory Wall ↗