mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

POLCA: Power Oversubscription in LLM Cloud Providers

arXiv 2308.12908 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2023cs.DC cs.AR cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent innovation in large language models (LLMs), and their myriad use-cases have rapidly driven up the compute capacity demand for datacenter GPUs. Several cloud providers and other enterprises have made substantial plans of growth in their datacenters to support these new workloads. One of the key bottleneck resources in datacenters is power, and given the increasing model sizes of LLMs, they are becoming increasingly power intensive. In this paper, we show that there is a significant opportunity to oversubscribe power in LLM clusters. Power oversubscription improves the power efficiency of these datacenters, allowing more deployable servers per datacenter, and reduces the deployment time, since building new datacenters is slow. We extensively characterize the power consumption patterns of a variety of LLMs and their configurations. We identify the differences between the inference and training power consumption patterns. Based on our analysis of these LLMs, we claim that the average and peak power utilization in LLM clusters for inference should not be very high. Our deductions align with the data from production LLM clusters, revealing that inference workloads offer substantial headroom for power oversubscription. However, the stringent set of telemetry and controls that GPUs offer in a virtualized environment, makes it challenging to have a reliable and robust power oversubscription mechanism. We propose POLCA, our framework for power oversubscription that is robust, reliable, and readily deployable for GPU clusters. Using open-source models to replicate the power patterns observed in production, we simulate POLCA and demonstrate that we can deploy 30% more servers in the same GPU cluster for inference, with minimal performance loss

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2023.

Builds on

15 of 53 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  5. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
  6. 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,829
  7. 2022DeepSpeed Inference: Enabling Efficient Inference of Transformer Models at Unprecedented Scalecited by 403
  8. 2022Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Modelcited by 264
  9. 2022The Carbon Footprint of Machine Learning Training Will Plateau, Then Shrinkcited by 183
  10. 2019Analysis of Large-Scale Multi-Tenant GPU Clusters for DNN Training Workloadscited by 79
  11. 2022Zeus: Understanding and Optimizing GPU Energy Consumption of DNN Trainingcited by 78
  12. 2021Characterization and Prediction of Deep Learning Workloads in Large-Scale GPU Datacenterscited by 31
3 more
  1. 2022Singularity: Planet-Scale, Preemptive and Elastic Scheduling of AI Workloadscited by 9
  2. 2022Not All GPUs Are Created Equal: Characterizing Variability in Large-Scale, Accelerator-Rich Systemscited by 9
  3. 2020Prediction-Based Power Oversubscription in Cloud Platformscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

8 papers.