Routing by Reasoning Need: Trajectory-Aware Decoding Control for Diffusion Vision-Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Diffusion vision-language models generate answers through iterative refinement, exposing intermediate answer trajectories that can be inspected and controlled at inference time. However, this controllability creates a reasoning-need mismatch, where a universal generation length is applied to questions with different reasoning demands. Visually closed questions may be harmed by continued refinement after a stable answer has formed, whereas reasoning-sensitive questions may be harmed by premature commitment. We formulate this problem as reasoning-budget mismatch and study it in LLaDA-V. Rather than choosing a universal generation length, our training-free controller routes each example to early commitment, baseline preservation, or reasoning-supportive decoding using trajectory signals from answer closure, commitment evidence, and representation revision pressure, without using ground-truth answers. Across answer-focused, mixed-reasoning, and CoT-sensitive benchmarks, routed control improves robustness over fixed long decoding, pure short decoding, and single-rule interventions. The gains are not explained by shorter outputs alone. Answer-closed examples often benefit from commitment, whereas CoT-sensitive examples require preserving or supporting intermediate reasoning. Taken together, these results suggest diffusion VLM decoding should route inference-time control by the state suggested by the observed trajectory instead of relying on a universal decoding length.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 4 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.
Builds on
4 of 25 references.
References · 4
- 2025Diffusion LLM with Native Variable Generation Lengths: Let [EOS] Lead the Waycited by 22
- 2025Chain-of-Thought Prompting Obscures Hallucination Cues in Large Language Models: An Empirical Evaluationcited by 20
- 2025MIRAGE: A Benchmark for Multimodal Information-Seeking and Reasoning in Agricultural Expert-Guided Conversationscited by 12
- 2024Knowledge Acquisition Disentanglement for Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering with Large Language Modelscited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025More Than Meets the Eye? Uncovering the Reasoning-Planning Disconnect in Training Vision-Language Driving Models
- 2025Knowing the Answer Isn't Enough: Fixing Reasoning Path Failures in LVLMs
- 2026Test-Time Scaling with Diffusion Language Models via Reward-Guided Stitching
- 2023IdealGPT: Iteratively Decomposing Vision and Language Reasoning via Large Language Models
- 2025TRACE: A Framework for Analyzing and Enhancing Stepwise Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
- 2026From Perception to Integration: Revisiting the Internal Dynamics of Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Looks the Same, Answers Differently: Flip-Direction Steering for Robust Vision-Language Reasoning
- 2026Reasoning that Travels: Dissecting How Chain-of-Thought Transfers Across Models