TRACE: A Framework for Analyzing and Enhancing Stepwise Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reliable mathematical and scientific reasoning remains an open challenge for large vision-language models. Standard final-answer evaluation often masks reasoning errors, allowing silent failures to persist. To address this gap, we introduce TRACE, a framework for Transparent Reasoning And Consistency Evaluation that diagnoses reasoning trajectories rather than only end results. At its core, TRACE leverages Auxiliary Reasoning Sets, compact sub question answer pairs that decompose complex problems, evaluate intermediate steps through consistency-based metrics, and expose failures overlooked by standard evaluation. Our experiments show that consistency across ARS correlates with final-answer correctness and helps pinpoint the reasoning steps where failures arise, offering actionable signals for model improvement. Furthermore, TRACE defines confidence regions that distinguish reliable from unreliable reasoning paths, supporting effective filtering, debugging, and model refinement.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2025.
Builds on
12 of 15 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Measuring Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning with MATH-Vision Dataset22 Feb
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts3 Oct
- 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering20 Sep
Other references · 9
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
- 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,057
- 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 668
- 2025Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithfulcited by 166
- 2025Is Chain-of-Thought Reasoning of LLMs a Mirage? A Data Distribution Lenscited by 42
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025PRISM-Bench: A Benchmark of Puzzle-Based Visual Tasks with CoT Error Detection
- 2026Reasoning as a Double-Edged Sword: Architecture and Cross-Stage Robustness in Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2025VERIFY: A Benchmark of Visual Explanation and Reasoning for Investigating Multimodal Reasoning Fidelity
- 2026From Perception to Integration: Revisiting the Internal Dynamics of Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
- 2023Measuring and Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Reasoning Dynamics and the Limits of Monitoring Modality Reliance in Vision-Language Models
- 2025Diagnosing Visual Reasoning: Challenges, Insights, and a Path Forward
- 2025Knowing the Answer Isn't Enough: Fixing Reasoning Path Failures in LVLMs