mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Looks the Same, Answers Differently: Flip-Direction Steering for Robust Vision-Language Reasoning

arXiv 2609.28851 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning also fits: Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong visual reasoning performance, yet subtle changes from routine image capture and processing can alter their reasoning trajectories even when images appear nearly identical. In long-horizon generation, the resulting activation shifts may accumulate across decoding steps, progressively altering reasoning tokens and ultimately changing the final answer, a phenomenon referred to as answer flips. To address this instability, we propose FlipDir (Flip-Direction Steering), a training-free inference-time method that estimates a low-rank flip-inducing activation subspace from contrastive pairs of original and answer-flipping inputs and selectively steers hidden states during decoding. A margin-based gate limits subspace attenuation to uncertain decoding steps, recovering original predictions while preserving stable ones. To evaluate robustness beyond accuracy or consistency on fixed test sets, we introduce VisFlip, a benchmark framework that constructs evaluation groups for a target model and visual variation setting to separately assess recovery of original predictions and preservation of stable ones. VisFlip spans nine dataset-variation combinations across scientific reasoning, robot-scene understanding, and medical VQA, covering subtle visual variations common in each domain. Experiments across 18 settings demonstrate that FlipDir consistently outperforms existing methods on the combined recovery and preservation metric. We will make our code publicly available.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 7 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2026.

Builds on

7 of 29 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Benchmarking Large Multimodal Models against Common Corruptions22 Jan

Other references · 6

  1. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
  2. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
  3. 2024GMAI-MMBench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Evaluation Benchmark Towards General Medical AIcited by 96
  4. 2025Robo2VLM: Visual Question Answering from Large-Scale In-the-Wild Robot Manipulation Datasetscited by 40
  5. 2024MedMNIST-C: Comprehensive benchmark and improved classifier robustness by simulating realistic image corruptionscited by 17
  6. 2025Questioning the Stability of Visual Question Answeringcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Perception to Integration: Revisiting the Internal Dynamics of Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026Addressing Overthinking in Large Vision-Language Models via Gated Perception-Reasoning Optimization
  3. 2025DeepThinkVLA: Enhancing Reasoning Capability of Vision-Language-Action Models
  4. 2026Evidence-RL: Towards Evidence-intensive Visual Reasoning
  5. 2026Instruction-Evidence Contrastive Dual-Stream Decoding for Grounded Vision-Language Reasoning
  6. 2026The Cartesian Shortcut: Re-evaluate Vision Reasoning in Polar Coordinate Space
  7. 2026ViThinker: Active Vision-Language Reasoning via Dynamic Perceptual Querying
  8. 2023Large Language Models are Visual Reasoning Coordinators