Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a (3.50×) speedup.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 18 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.
Builds on
18 of 27 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 17
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
- 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,210
- 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,134
- 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,107
- 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,029
5 more
- 2024Taming Throughput-Latency Tradeoff in LLM Inference with Sarathi-Servecited by 507
- 2024Llumnix: Dynamic Scheduling for Large Language Model Servingcited by 167
- 2024Parrot: Efficient Serving of LLM-based Applications with Semantic Variablecited by 96
- 2023Fairness in Serving Large Language Modelscited by 77
- 2025JITServe: SLO-aware LLM Serving with Imprecise Request Informationcited by 17
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026PeakBench: Benchmarking Resource-Aware Tool Invocation in LLM Agents
- 2026HexAGenT: Efficient Agentic LLM Serving via Workflow- and Heterogeneity-Aware Scheduling
- 2026Pythia: Exploiting Workflow Predictability for Efficient Agent-Native LLM Serving
- 2026Claw-Eval-Live: A Live Agent Benchmark for Evolving Real-World Workflows
- 2026VineLM: Trie-Based Fine-Grained Control for Agentic Workflows
- 2026Cost-Aware Speculative Execution for LLM-Agent Workflows: An Integrated Five-Dimension Method
- 2026TomasuLLM: Out-of-Order Speculative Execution for LLM Agents
- 2026From Static Templates to Dynamic Runtime Graphs: A Survey of Workflow Optimization for LLM Agents