mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

arXiv 2609.10928 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit it confidence, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.

Builds on

25 of 65 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  2. 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 235
  3. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 219
  4. 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 219
  5. 2022AUC Maximization in the Era of Big Data and AI: A Surveycited by 100
  6. 2020Large-scale Robust Deep AUC Maximization: A New Surrogate Loss and Empirical Studies on Medical Image Classificationcited by 86
  7. 2023Benchmarking Distribution Shift in Tabular Data with TableShiftcited by 66
  8. 2020Confidence Scores Make Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning Possiblecited by 63
  9. 2019Stochastic AUC Maximization with Deep Neural Networkscited by 61
  10. 2024A Closer Look at AUROC and AUPRC under Class Imbalancecited by 57
  11. 2019On Symmetric Losses for Learning from Corrupted Labelscited by 53
  12. 2020Non-Negative Bregman Divergence Minimization for Deep Direct Density Ratio Estimationcited by 45
13 more
  1. 2018Beyond the Selected Completely At Random Assumption for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Datacited by 36
  2. 2022Is the Performance of My Deep Network Too Good to Be True? A Direct Approach to Estimating the Bayes Error in Binary Classificationcited by 26
  3. 2017Binary Classification from Positive-Confidence Datacited by 23
  4. 2017Semi-Supervised AUC Optimization based on Positive-Unlabeled Learningcited by 20
  5. 2020Pointwise Binary Classification with Pairwise Confidence Comparisonscited by 20
  6. 2021Learning from Similarity-Confidence Datacited by 19
  7. 2018Instance-Dependent PU Learning by Bayesian Optimal Relabelingcited by 18
  8. 2022Learning from Multiple Expert Annotators for Enhancing Anomaly Detection in Medical Image Analysiscited by 13
  9. 2023Binary Classification with Confidence Differencecited by 13
  10. 2023Weakly Supervised AUC Optimization: A Unified Partial AUC Approachcited by 11
  11. 2020Binary Classification from Positive Data with Skewed Confidencecited by 8
  12. 2025Practical estimation of the optimal classification error with soft labels and calibrationcited by 6
  13. 2025Interestingness First Classifierscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.