mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Edu-QuRating: Multi-Dimensional Educational Data Curation with Distilled Pairwise Judgements

arXiv 2609.09425 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Educational data filters have become a practical way to improve language-model pre-training, but most filters treat educational value as a single scalar property. This may be too broad for some applications, especially if the data set already features a high density of educational material. Useful learning material needs to be accurate, engaging, well structured, and appropriate for the intended audience and application (e.g. learner- vs teacher-facing). Following QuRating (Wettig et al. 2024), we introduce Edu-QuRating: a pipeline for multi-dimensional educational data scoring and curation. Edu-QuRating defines education-specific rubrics, uses an LLM judge to label sampled document pairs and distills those pairwise preferences into reusable Edu-QuRaters, which can score individual text chunks on a set of educational criteria. Across two sequence-classification base models and six educational criteria, the best Edu-QuRater recovers held-out GPT-4.1-mini pairwise judgements with mean accuracy 0.917. We then apply the resulting scorers in two applications. First, we investigate the potential of Edu-QuRaters for corpus filtering to improve pretraining of small language models. We scored 322.25M FineWeb-Edu-Fortified documents to obtain a filtered pre-training mixture. In matched single-run pre-training comparisons, models trained with Edu-QuRating-based mixtures reached higher observed aggregate accuracy across nine benchmarks than the FineWeb-Edu baseline, with gains concentrated in particular tasks. Second, we used Edu-QuRater scores as reward terms for GRPO post-training. In held-out pairwise judge evaluations, combining Edu-QuRater and answer-structure rewards produced responses preferred to the Qwen3-4B base model on both pedagogical quality and instruction following.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2026.

Builds on

9 of 41 references.

References · 9

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 755
  4. 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 475
  5. 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 425
  6. 2025SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Modelcited by 307
  7. 2024QuRating: Selecting High-Quality Data for Training Language Modelscited by 153
  8. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Small LLMs: What Works and What Doesn'tcited by 72
  9. 2025DRA-GRPO: Your GRPO Needs to Know Diverse Reasoning Paths for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 18

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025An Open-Source Dual-Loss Embedding Model for Semantic Retrieval in Higher Education
  2. 2025Embedding-Based Rankings of Educational Resources based on Learning Outcome Alignment: Benchmarking, Expert Validation, and Learner Performance
  3. 2026Rethinking Data Curation in LLM Training: Online Reweighting Offers Better Generalization than Offline Methods
  4. 2025OmniEduBench: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Education
  5. 2023A Large Language Model Approach to Educational Survey Feedback Analysis
  6. 2025Cream of the Crop: Harvesting Rich, Scalable and Transferable Multi-Modal Data for Instruction Fine-Tuning
  7. 2025TACOS: Open Tagging and Comparative Scoring for Instruction Fine-Tuning Data Selection
  8. 2024Learning to Love Edge Cases in Formative Math Assessment: Using the AMMORE Dataset and Chain-of-Thought Prompting to Improve Grading Accuracy