Edu-QuRating: Multi-Dimensional Educational Data Curation with Distilled Pairwise Judgements
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Educational data filters have become a practical way to improve language-model pre-training, but most filters treat educational value as a single scalar property. This may be too broad for some applications, especially if the data set already features a high density of educational material. Useful learning material needs to be accurate, engaging, well structured, and appropriate for the intended audience and application (e.g. learner- vs teacher-facing). Following QuRating (Wettig et al. 2024), we introduce Edu-QuRating: a pipeline for multi-dimensional educational data scoring and curation. Edu-QuRating defines education-specific rubrics, uses an LLM judge to label sampled document pairs and distills those pairwise preferences into reusable Edu-QuRaters, which can score individual text chunks on a set of educational criteria. Across two sequence-classification base models and six educational criteria, the best Edu-QuRater recovers held-out GPT-4.1-mini pairwise judgements with mean accuracy 0.917. We then apply the resulting scorers in two applications. First, we investigate the potential of Edu-QuRaters for corpus filtering to improve pretraining of small language models. We scored 322.25M FineWeb-Edu-Fortified documents to obtain a filtered pre-training mixture. In matched single-run pre-training comparisons, models trained with Edu-QuRating-based mixtures reached higher observed aggregate accuracy across nine benchmarks than the FineWeb-Edu baseline, with gains concentrated in particular tasks. Second, we used Edu-QuRater scores as reward terms for GRPO post-training. In held-out pairwise judge evaluations, combining Edu-QuRater and answer-structure rewards produced responses preferred to the Qwen3-4B base model on both pedagogical quality and instruction following.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2026.
Builds on
9 of 41 references.
References · 9
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 755
- 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 475
- 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 425
- 2025SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Modelcited by 307
- 2024QuRating: Selecting High-Quality Data for Training Language Modelscited by 153
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Small LLMs: What Works and What Doesn'tcited by 72
- 2025DRA-GRPO: Your GRPO Needs to Know Diverse Reasoning Paths for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 18
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025An Open-Source Dual-Loss Embedding Model for Semantic Retrieval in Higher Education
- 2025Embedding-Based Rankings of Educational Resources based on Learning Outcome Alignment: Benchmarking, Expert Validation, and Learner Performance
- 2026Rethinking Data Curation in LLM Training: Online Reweighting Offers Better Generalization than Offline Methods
- 2025OmniEduBench: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Education
- 2023A Large Language Model Approach to Educational Survey Feedback Analysis
- 2025Cream of the Crop: Harvesting Rich, Scalable and Transferable Multi-Modal Data for Instruction Fine-Tuning
- 2025TACOS: Open Tagging and Comparative Scoring for Instruction Fine-Tuning Data Selection
- 2024Learning to Love Edge Cases in Formative Math Assessment: Using the AMMORE Dataset and Chain-of-Thought Prompting to Improve Grading Accuracy