VANTAGE-Bench: Evaluating the Infrastructure AI Gap in Vision-Language Models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models
Abstract (arXiv)
As Vision-Language Models (VLMs) advance toward physical deployment, the focus has remained on action-oriented Embodied AI evaluated on subject-centric consumer video. This overlooks a pervasive class of Physical AI: Infrastructure AI, which relies on fixed cameras for open-loop insights like safety monitoring and operational logging. We introduce VANTAGE-Bench, a benchmark measuring this "Infrastructure AI Gap." It spans three operational domains (Logistics, Transportation, and Smart Spaces), unifies image and video evaluation across semantic, spatial, temporal, and spatio-temporal capabilities, and moves beyond multiple-choice to eight task formulations including dense captioning and spatio-temporal grounding. It adds a single-pass trajectory protocol for Single Object Tracking and, to our knowledge, the first such evaluation on fixed-camera infrastructure video, scored against specialist trackers. Annotation spans three regimes over 3,346 media assets: 3,342 video-task annotations, 4,281 image-grounding annotations, and 27,404 detection boxes. Evaluating 17 models zero-shot, we find the shortfall relative to consumer-centric benchmarks is concentrated, not general. Event verification, referring expressions, and temporal localization fall roughly 9 to 24 points at every model scale, while video question answering stays within 5.3 points of VideoMME and 2D spatial pointing shows no shortfall against BLINK. The temporal pillar is weakest in absolute terms: no system exceeds 55.7 mIoU on temporal localization or 37.3 SODA_c on dense video captioning. On tracking, frontier models come within roughly 5 points of specialist trackers over short horizons but separate as the horizon extends. Open-weight models lead 2D object localization outright, so neither scale nor proprietary access explains the pattern. Data, evaluation harness, and leaderboard: https://vantage-bench.org/
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 32 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2026.
Builds on
32 of 45 references.
References · 32
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
- 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,534
- 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,436
- 2024Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysiscited by 1,375
- 2021Grounded Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 1,147
- 2023MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,086
- 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,054
- 2025SAM 3: Segment Anything with Conceptscited by 835
- 2017Dense-Captioning Events in Videoscited by 789
- 2023EgoSchema: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Very Long-form Video Language Understandingcited by 666
- 2017TALL: Temporal Activity Localization via Language Querycited by 581
20 more
- 2018Real-world Anomaly Detection in Surveillance Videoscited by 570
- 2016MOT16: A Benchmark for Multi-Object Trackingcited by 531
- 2024BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceivecited by 529
- 2018GOT-10k: A Large High-Diversity Benchmark for Generic Object Tracking in the Wildcited by 471
- 2024VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Modelscited by 443
- 2018LaSOT: A High-quality Benchmark for Large-scale Single Object Trackingcited by 424
- 2024MLVU: Benchmarking Multi-task Long Video Understandingcited by 275
- 2025VideoChat-R1: Enhancing Spatio-Temporal Perception via Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 248
- 2024MMT-Bench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models Towards Multitask AGIcited by 192
- 2024Adding Error Bars to Evals: A Statistical Approach to Language Model Evaluationscited by 130
- 2021Towards More Flexible and Accurate Object Tracking with Natural Language: Algorithms and Benchmarkcited by 124
- 2020Where Does It Exist: Spatio-Temporal Video Grounding for Multi-Form Sentencescited by 116
- 2020Human-centric Spatio-Temporal Video Grounding With Visual Transformerscited by 83
- 2024SUTrack: Towards Simple and Unified Single Object Trackingcited by 51
- 2024Elysium: Exploring Object-level Perception in Videos via MLLMcited by 48
- 2023Merlin:Empowering Multimodal LLMs with Foresight Mindscited by 46
- 2024Exploring Enhanced Contextual Information for Video-Level Object Trackingcited by 36
- 2025RefDrone: A Challenging Benchmark for Referring Expression Comprehension in Drone Scenescited by 17
- 2025R1-Track: Direct Application of MLLMs to Visual Object Tracking via Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
- 2026The 10th AI City Challengecited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026InfraVLA: Extending Vision-Language-Action Navigation with Infrastructure Cameras
- 2026Molmo2: Open Weights and Data for Vision-Language Models with Video Understanding and Grounding
- 2026EPIC-Bench: A Perception-Centric Benchmark for Fine-Grained Embodied Visual Grounding in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Can Vision-Language Models Solve the Shell Game?
- 2025Bridging vision language model (VLM) evaluation gaps with a framework for scalable and cost-effective benchmark generation
- 2025MMSI-Video-Bench: A Holistic Benchmark for Video-Based Spatial Intelligence
- 2026EgoSafetyBench: A Diagnostic Egocentric Video Benchmark for Evaluating Embodied VLMs as Runtime Safety Guards
- 2025Point-It-Out: Benchmarking Embodied Reasoning for Vision Language Models in Multi-Stage Visual Grounding