EviSI: An Evidence-Based Evaluation Agent for Simultaneous Interpreting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Low-latency simultaneous speech-to-speech translation must keep pace with ongoing speech while preserving key information. To meet these demands, systems use segmentation, reformulation and condensation to reorganize and rephrase information. However, metrics developed for text translation, including BLEU and COMET, may not consistently distinguish faithful adaptations from semantic errors. We propose EviSI, a large language model evaluation agent combining Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM) with criteria developed with professional interpreters. Shared source evidence guides assessment across four dimensions: Anchor, Event, Logic and Fluency. Verified errors are deduplicated before deterministic scoring. On human-rated English to Chinese and Chinese to English data, EviSI recovers the aggregate English to Chinese human system ranking. Mean within-dataset Kendall correlations for system rankings reach 0.707 and 0.467, respectively, exceeding evaluated BLEU and COMET baselines. A multilingual extension to five directions without human ratings retains the dimensions and scoring rule, showing positive system ranking correlations with COMET throughout.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2026.
Builds on
17 of 30 references.
References · 17
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
- 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 420
- 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
- 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 265
- 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 207
- 2021To Ship or Not to Ship: An Extensive Evaluation of Automatic Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 163
- 2023GEMBA-MQM: Detecting Translation Quality Error Spans with GPT-4cited by 146
- 2023The Devil is in the Errors: Leveraging Large Language Models for Fine-grained Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 95
- 2024StreamSpeech: Simultaneous Speech-to-Speech Translation with Multi-task Learningcited by 21
- 2024Lost in the Source Language: How Large Language Models Evaluate the Quality of Machine Translationcited by 16
- 2024Towards Achieving Human Parity on End-to-end Simultaneous Speech Translation via LLM Agentcited by 14
- 2024M-MAD: Multidimensional Multi-Agent Debate for Advanced Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 13
5 more
- 2024The Multi-Range Theory of Translation Quality Measurement: MQM scoring models and Statistical Quality Controlcited by 9
- 2022Continuous Rating as Reliable Human Evaluation of Simultaneous Speech Translationcited by 6
- 2024Exploring the Correlation between Human and Machine Evaluation of Simultaneous Speech Translationcited by 4
- 2026Redefining Machine Simultaneous Interpretation: From Incremental Translation to Human-Like Strategiescited by 1
- 2026A Practical Evaluation Method for Long-Form Simultaneous Speech-to-Speech Translationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025TransEvalnia: Reasoning-based Evaluation and Ranking of Translations
- 2023Error Analysis Prompting Enables Human-Like Translation Evaluation in Large Language Models
- 2026Rubric-Aligned Disentangled Evaluation of Human Simultaneous Interpreting
- 2025HiMATE: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Machine Translation Evaluation
- 2025LaoBench: A Large-Scale Multidimensional Lao Benchmark for Large Language Models
- 2025LLMs Are Not Scorers: Rethinking MT Evaluation with Generation-Based Methods
- 2025Remedy: Learning Machine Translation Evaluation from Human Preferences with Reward Modeling
- 2026Beyond Literal Mapping: Benchmarking and Improving Non-Literal Translation Evaluation