Towards a Resilience-Theoretic Foundation for Adversarial Robustness in Industrial Control System Anomaly Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Anomaly-based intrusion detection systems in industrial control systems (ICS) and operational technology (OT) environments are increasingly required to meet formal resilience criteria: absorbed adversarial disturbances, graceful degradation under sustained attack, and certified system-level guarantees. Existing resilience frameworks for cyber-physical systems define absorb-recover-adapt trajectories at the architectural level but do not treat machine learning anomaly detectors as first-class components, leaving a gap between component-level robustness evaluation and system-level resilience certification. In this paper, we establish that adversarial robustness in ICS anomaly detection is a specific instantiation of system resilience, and formalise this connection by mapping four resilience constructs, i.e. disturbance class, absorption capacity, recovery trajectory, and degradation function, onto the adversarial machine learning setting. We derive a compositional resilience bound for heterogeneous ICS detection networks, showing that the binding constraint on system-level resilience is the coupling-adjusted absorption capacity of each node along the attack path, not the per-node capacity -- so the binding node need not be the weakest one. Empirical validation on the BATADAL water distribution system benchmark demonstrates that the resulting metrics surface operationally significant phenomena invisible to standard benchmarks: the absorption-degradation divergence under adversarial training, and the paradox that hardening the binding node in isolation reduces system-level resilience. Implications for ICS architecture design and certification standards are discussed.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.
Builds on
13 of 40 references.
References · 13
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
- 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 414
- 2019Adversarial Attacks on Deep Neural Networks for Time Series Classificationcited by 53
- 2019Robust Anomaly Detection in Images using Adversarial Autoencoderscited by 38
- 2020Cybersecurity for Industrial Control Systems: A Surveycited by 12
- 2020Adversarial Attacks on Machine Learning Cybersecurity Defences in Industrial Control Systemscited by 10
- 2019Adversarial Attacks on Time-Series Intrusion Detection for Industrial Control Systemscited by 8
- 2021Adversarial Attacks and Mitigation for Anomaly Detectors of Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 6
1 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.