mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PhysSAE: Mechanistic Interpretability of PINNs with Sparse Autoencoders

arXiv 2609.07061 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2026cs.LG physics.comp-phcited by 0

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) embed PDE residuals into neural network training, but their internal representations remain opaque: it is unknown what physical features their hidden layers encode or whether those features have a localized causal role. We present PhysSAE, a mechanistic interpretability framework that trains overcomplete sparse autoencoders (SAEs) on PINN penultimate-layer activations and evaluates dictionary atoms through direct causal intervention in the original frozen hidden state: hcf = h - α zk dk, bypassing the SAE decoder entirely. Across six PDE families, with 3 PINN seeds and 3 SAE seeds each---we show that (i) Our discovered SAE atoms align with independently-defined physical observables (max Pearson |r|=0.951, always gg permutation null), (ii) the causal footprint of top-aligned atom ablation is 1.2--4.2× more spatially concentrated canonical than PCA or ICA interventions, and (iii) top-aligned atoms outperform matched random controls on causal localization for structured physical concepts (ESF80 advantage 0.04-0.44). Two-atom bilateral representations improve concept regression R2 by Delta R2!=!0.05-0.15 over single atoms, while random pairs decrease it by up to 0.60. These results demonstrate that PINNs develop sparse, physically structured latent representations that can be identified and causally interrogated post-hoc, opening a path toward interpretability-aware scientific machine learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.

Builds on

14 of 22 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Physics Steering: Causal Control of Cross-Domain Concepts in a Physics Foundation Model25 Nov
  2. 2025Mechanistic Interpretability with Sparse Autoencoder Neural Operators3 Sep
  3. 2025Interpreting CFD Surrogates through Sparse Autoencoders21 Jul

Other references · 11

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  3. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  4. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  5. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  6. 2020On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networkscited by 284
  7. 2020Self-Adaptive Physics-Informed Neural Networks using a Soft Attention Mechanismcited by 233
  8. 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 191
  9. 2022Respecting causality is all you need for training physics-informed neural networkscited by 156
  10. 2024Kolmogorov Arnold Informed neural network: A physics-informed deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems based on Kolmogorov Arnold Networkscited by 67
  11. 2025Is the end of Insight in Sight ?cited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Geometric Recovery to Causal Validation: A Reproducible Audit of Sparse Autoencoder Features, from Superposition Geometry to Causal Inertness
  2. 2025Equivariant Sparse Autoencoders: Mechanistic Interpretability of Neural Networks on Symmetric Data
  3. 2026Finding and using interpretable latents in a neutrino foundation model with sparse autoencoders
  4. 2024From Neurons to Neutrons: A Case Study in Interpretability
  5. 2026Sparse probes and murky physics: a case study of interpretability challenges in a foundation model for continuum dynamics
  6. 2024Analyzing (In)Abilities of SAEs via Formal Languages
  7. 2026Mechanistic Interpretability for Neural Networks: Circuits, Sparse Features and Symbolic Reasoning
  8. 2025A Unified Theory of Sparse Dictionary Learning in Mechanistic Interpretability: Piecewise Biconvexity and Spurious Minima