mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Neurons to Neutrons: A Case Study in Interpretability

arXiv 2405.17425 ↗First posted 27 May 2024cs.LG nucl-thcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Mechanistic Interpretability (MI) promises a path toward fully understanding how neural networks make their predictions. Prior work demonstrates that even when trained to perform simple arithmetic, models can implement a variety of algorithms (sometimes concurrently) depending on initialization and hyperparameters. Does this mean neuron-level interpretability techniques have limited applicability? We argue that high-dimensional neural networks can learn low-dimensional representations of their training data that are useful beyond simply making good predictions. Such representations can be understood through the mechanistic interpretability lens and provide insights that are surprisingly faithful to human-derived domain knowledge. This indicates that such approaches to interpretability can be useful for deriving a new understanding of a problem from models trained to solve it. As a case study, we extract nuclear physics concepts by studying models trained to reproduce nuclear data.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2024.

Builds on

22 of 43 references.

References · 22

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  2. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  3. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  4. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  5. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
  6. 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 822
  7. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 658
  8. 2018Disentangling by Factorisingcited by 614
  9. 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 417
  10. 2024SliceGPT: Compress Large Language Models by Deleting Rows and Columnscited by 378
  11. 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 364
  12. 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 306
10 more
  1. 2018Towards a Definition of Disentangled Representationscited by 294
  2. 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
  3. 2022Towards Understanding Grokking: An Effective Theory of Representation Learningcited by 229
  4. 2023The Clock and the Pizza: Two Stories in Mechanistic Explanation of Neural Networkscited by 153
  5. 2023Eight Things to Know about Large Language Modelscited by 73
  6. 2022Rediscovering orbital mechanics with machine learningcited by 71
  7. 2023GPT4GEO: How a Language Model Sees the World's Geographycited by 68
  8. 2022How Much Does Attention Actually Attend? Questioning the Importance of Attention in Pretrained Transformerscited by 20
  9. 2023WorldSense: A Synthetic Benchmark for Grounded Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 19
  10. 2018PCA of high dimensional random walks with comparison to neural network trainingcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.