Physics Steering: Causal Control of Cross-Domain Concepts in a Physics Foundation Model
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in mechanistic interpretability have revealed that large language models (LLMs) develop internal representations corresponding not only to concrete entities but also distinct, human-understandable abstract concepts and behaviour. Moreover, these hidden features can be directly manipulated to steer model behaviour. However, it remains an open question whether this phenomenon is unique to models trained on inherently structured data (ie. language, images) or if it is a general property of foundation models. In this work, we investigate the internal representations of a large physics-focused foundation model. Inspired by recent work identifying single directions in activation space for complex behaviours in LLMs, we extract activation vectors from the model during forward passes over simulation datasets for different physical regimes. We then compute "delta" representations between the two regimes. These delta tensors act as concept directions in activation space, encoding specific physical features. By injecting these concept directions back into the model during inference, we can steer its predictions, demonstrating causal control over physical behaviours, such as inducing or removing some particular physical feature from a simulation. These results suggest that scientific foundation models learn generalised representations of physical principles. They do not merely rely on superficial correlations and patterns in the simulations. Our findings open new avenues for understanding and controlling scientific foundation models and has implications for AI-enabled scientific discovery.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2025.
Builds on
21 of 38 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,307
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 960
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 822
9 more
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2022PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 396
- 2019Axial Attention in Multidimensional Transformerscited by 350
- 2023ClimaX: A foundation model for weather and climatecited by 325
- 2025Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Modelscited by 293
- 2024The Well: a Large-Scale Collection of Diverse Physics Simulations for Machine Learningcited by 134
- 2023Multiple Physics Pretraining for Physical Surrogate Modelscited by 90
- 2022Polysemanticity and Capacity in Neural Networkscited by 74
- 2023AstroLLaMA: Towards Specialized Foundation Models in Astronomycited by 41
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.