Beyond Retraining-Free MoE Compression: A Cost-Normalized Study of Post-Compression Adjustment
On the map: Mixture-of-experts → Efficient MoE training and inference systems
Abstract (arXiv)
Retraining-free MoE compression reduces deployment memory by pruning or merging experts, but often treats the compressed checkpoint as the final artifact. We argue that this view is incomplete: compressed MoE checkpoints are better understood as compressed initializations that benefit from a tiny post-compression adjustment stage. Across two MoE LLM backbones, four pruning/merging methods, three expert-retention ratios, and 28 benchmarks, we compare LM fine-tuning and teacher-based KD under matched small-data budgets and measured GPU costs. Using only 3,000 C4 examples and a single epoch of adjustment, Full FT recovers 37.3% of the original-to-compressed performance gap on average. Moreover, LM fine-tuning is more cost-effective than standard token-level KD, and full-parameter adjustment gives the strongest cost--recovery trade-off among the tested scopes. These results suggest that retraining-free compression should be paired with small post-compression adjustment to recover a substantial portion of the performance lost during compression.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Efficient MoE training and inference systems, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 53 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2026.
Builds on
53 of 67 references.
References · 53
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
38 more
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
- 2020GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Shardingcited by 1,631
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
- 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,395
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
- 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,356
- 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 710
- 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 683
- 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 621
- 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 575
- 2023FlexGen: High-Throughput Generative Inference of Large Language Models with a Single GPUcited by 575
- 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 492
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 442
- 2024Not All Experts are Equal: Efficient Expert Pruning and Skipping for Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Modelscited by 146
- 2023Merge, Then Compress: Demystify Efficient SMoE with Hints from Its Routing Policycited by 108
- 2024MoE-Pruner: Pruning Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Model using the Hints from Its Routercited by 62
- 2024MoE-I2: Compressing Mixture of Experts Models through Inter-Expert Pruning and Intra-Expert Low-Rank Decompositioncited by 57
- 2024Efficient Expert Pruning for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Language Models: Enhancing Performance and Reducing Inference Costscited by 53
- 2025REAP the Experts: Why Pruning Prevails for One-Shot MoE compressioncited by 44
- 2024Retraining-Free Merging of Sparse MoE via Hierarchical Clusteringcited by 35
- 2025Delta Decompression for MoE-based LLMs Compressioncited by 33
- 2025Sub-MoE: Efficient Mixture-of-Expert LLMs Compression via Subspace Expert Mergingcited by 28
- 2025DiEP: Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts Compression through Differentiable Expert Pruningcited by 26
- 2025Dropping Experts, Recombining Neurons: Retraining-Free Pruning for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts LLMscited by 25
- 2024Towards Efficient Mixture of Experts: A Holistic Study of Compression Techniquescited by 24
- 2025Finding Fantastic Experts in MoEs: A Unified Study for Expert Dropping Strategies and Observationscited by 20
- 2025Domain-Specific Pruning of Large Mixture-of-Experts Models with Few-shot Demonstrationscited by 16
- 2025MoNE: Replacing Redundant Experts with Lightweight Novices for Structured Pruning of MoEcited by 13
- 2024Condense, Don't Just Prune: Enhancing Efficiency and Performance in MoE Layer Pruningcited by 10
- 2025MoLAE: Mixture of Latent Experts for Parameter-Efficient Language Modelscited by 10
- 2025MergeMoE: Efficient Compression of MoE Models via Expert Output Mergingcited by 10
- 2025MoBE: Mixture-of-Basis-Experts for Compressing MoE-based LLMscited by 9
- 2025PuzzleMoE: Efficient Compression of Large Mixture-of-Experts Models via Sparse Expert Merging and Bit-packed inferencecited by 9
- 2025MoE Pathfinder: Trajectory-driven Expert Pruningcited by 7
50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Benchmarking Composable Compression Techniques in Mixture-of-Experts LLMs
- 2026Compression Method Matters: Benchmark-Dependent Output Dynamics in LLM Prompt Compression
- 2026Budget-Aware Compression Pipeline for Single-GPU LLM Inference: Methods, Trade-offs, and Coupling Effects
- 2026ConMoE: Expert-Pool Consolidation via Prototype Reassignment for MoE Compression
- 2023PERP: Rethinking the Prune-Retrain Paradigm in the Era of LLMs
- 2026More GPUs or a Smaller Cache? Tensor Parallelism versus KV Compression for Memory-Bound LLM Serving
- 2026SplitZip: Ultra Fast Lossless KV Compression for Disaggregated LLM Serving
- 2026Quantization-Aware Healing: A Practical Recipe for Recovering Compressed, 4-Bit LLMs