From Monolithic Blending to Agentic Orchestration: Dynamic Response for Conversational Assistants at Scale
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Conversational assistants can blend retrieval, action selection, escalation, and wording in a single model path, or separate those roles. We report a production migration of a customer-support assistant at a large accommodation marketplace (millions of conversations per month, 11 languages, 10-second P90). Dynamic Response (DR) replaces a single Qwen3-235B-A22B blended responder with a bounded ReAct orchestrator over typed tools plus a smaller generator that writes from a backend-validated context contract. Because the migration also changed prompts, alignment, and serving, we attribute each effect to its cause and claim as architecture effects only those measured on identical replayed turns: typed entity selection moves the reservation selector to a precision-first operating point (precision 8.3% to 89.1%, recall 75.2% to 67.3%), and typed action IDs with a membership check remove observed structured-action hallucination (2.14% to 0.0%). A low-ramp A/B test reproduces the replay escalation reductions: hard-escalation responses fall from 5.60% to 3.08% and soft-escalation responses from 9.56% to 2.49%, while production handoff volume holds roughly steady; self-solve is directional (+5.1 points, 95% CI [-2, +12]). Serving optimizations cut orchestrator P90 latency from 3.87s to 2.24s on a GPU footprint reduced by roughly one-third, and self-hosting reduces estimated annual model-serving cost by more than an order of magnitude.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 26 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2026.
Builds on
26 of 33 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Agent-in-the-Loop: A Data Flywheel for Continuous Improvement in LLM-based Customer Support8 Oct
Other references · 25
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
13 more
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,947
- 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,868
- 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,653
- 2023GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpointscited by 1,346
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
- 2023Accelerating Large Language Model Decoding with Speculative Samplingcited by 1,006
- 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 939
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
- 2025EAGLE-3: Scaling up Inference Acceleration of Large Language Models via Training-Time Testcited by 331
- 2025FlashInfer: Efficient and Customizable Attention Engine for LLM Inference Servingcited by 258
- 2025ECom-Bench: Can LLM Agent Resolve Real-World E-commerce Customer Support Issues?cited by 27
- 2024ProductAgent: Benchmarking Conversational Product Search Agent with Asking Clarification Questionscited by 10
- 2025Incremental Summarization for Customer Support via Progressive Note-Taking and Agent Feedbackcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026From Transcripts to AI Agents: Knowledge Extraction, RAG Integration, and Robust Evaluation of Conversational AI Assistants
- 2025Adaptive Multi-Agent Response Refinement in Conversational Systems
- 2026Iterating Toward Better Search: A Two-Agent Simulation Framework for Evaluating Agentic Search Architectures in E-Commerce
- 2026On Evaluating and Improving Conversational Agents in Production
- 2026Evaluating Real-Time Voice Agents: From Component Quality to Grounded Outcomes
- 2026Memory Makes the Difference: Evaluating How Different Memory Roles Shape Conversational Agents
- 2026Lost in the Request: How Communication Variation Disrupts Retrieval and Action in Email Agents
- 2026DuplexWorld: Can voice agents help you get through the day?