mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Discriminative Flow Matching: Beyond Time-Conditioning in Generative Restoration via Flow-State Representations

arXiv 2609.04525 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2026eess.AS cs.SDcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing Conditional Flow Matching (CFM) formulations describe transport progress using an explicit interpolation coordinate, commonly interpreted as time, assuming that a single global variable adequately represents a sample's position along the generative trajectory. In restoration tasks, however, transport progress is sample-dependent because the initial distribution may exhibit varying statistical dependencies with the target distribution. Thus, samples at the same interpolation coordinate can differ substantially in degradation level, distance to the target distribution, and restoration difficulty. We investigate whether signal representations learned by discriminatively trained models provide a meaningful description of generative transport state in CFM-based restoration. Through systematic latent-space analysis, we show that discriminative representations organize according to degradation severity and follow a consistent trajectory toward the clean-data manifold during generation. Motivated by these observations, we introduce the Discriminative Flow-State Hypothesis, which posits that discriminative representations encode a transport state governing generative restoration. Based on this hypothesis, we propose Discriminative Flow Matching, which conditions the Flow-Matching velocity field on Discriminative Flow-State Representations rather than explicit time coordinates. Experiments on speech enhancement and image denoising show that these representations characterize restoration progress, enable adaptive inference, and consistently outperform CFM and diffusion-related baselines. Our findings suggest that discriminative representations provide an effective state-aware alternative to explicit time conditioning and offer a novel perspective on the relationship between discriminative and CFM-based generative modeling.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 26 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.

Builds on

26 of 39 references.

References · 26

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
  3. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  4. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  5. 2016Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpaintingcited by 1,424
  6. 2018SDR - half-baked or well done?cited by 420
  7. 2020DNSMOS: A Non-Intrusive Perceptual Objective Speech Quality metric to evaluate Noise Suppressorscited by 235
  8. 2019Generalized Sliced Wasserstein Distancescited by 205
  9. 2020DCCRN: Deep Complex Convolution Recurrent Network for Phase-Aware Speech Enhancementcited by 133
  10. 2022Conditional Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Speech Enhancementcited by 132
  11. 2020The INTERSPEECH 2020 Deep Noise Suppression Challenge: Datasets, Subjective Testing Framework, and Challenge Resultscited by 128
  12. 2021MetricGAN+: An Improved Version of MetricGAN for Speech Enhancementcited by 114
14 more
  1. 2022StoRM: A Diffusion-based Stochastic Regeneration Model for Speech Enhancement and Dereverberationcited by 105
  2. 2022Speech Enhancement with Score-Based Generative Models in the Complex STFT Domaincited by 102
  3. 2019A Recurrent Variational Autoencoder for Speech Enhancementcited by 38
  4. 2024FlowAVSE: Efficient Audio-Visual Speech Enhancement with Conditional Flow Matchingcited by 23
  5. 2024SCOREQ: Speech Quality Assessment with Contrastive Regressioncited by 23
  6. 2024Diffusion-based Generative Modeling with Discriminative Guidance for Streamable Speech Enhancementcited by 8
  7. 2021Deep Noise Suppression Maximizing Non-Differentiable PESQ Mediated by a Non-Intrusive PESQNetcited by 7
  8. 2023SE-Bridge: Speech Enhancement with Consistent Brownian Bridgecited by 7
  9. 2023Ultra Low Complexity Deep Learning Based Noise Suppressioncited by 7
  10. 2024GAN-Based Speech Enhancement for Low SNR Using Latent Feature Conditioningcited by 6
  11. 2025Flowing Straighter with Conditional Flow Matching for Accurate Speech Enhancementcited by 3
  12. 2026Generative Control as Optimization: Time Unconditional Flow Matching for Adaptive and Robust Robotic Controlcited by 3
  13. 2024GALD-SE: Guided Anisotropic Lightweight Diffusion for Efficient Speech Enhancementcited by 1
  14. 2026Time-Unconditional Generative Speech Enhancement via Autonomous Rectified Flowcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026IR-Flow: Bridging Discriminative and Generative Image Restoration via Rectified Flow
  2. 2025Restora-Flow: Mask-Guided Image Restoration with Flow Matching
  3. 2025Contrastive Flow Matching
  4. 2026Difficulty-Calibrated Interpolation Paths for Conditional Flow Matching
  5. 2024Flow map matching with stochastic interpolants: A mathematical framework for consistency models
  6. 2025CAR-Flow: Condition-Aware Reparameterization Aligns Source and Target for Better Flow Matching
  7. 2025Flow Matching in the Low-Noise Regime: Pathologies and a Contrastive Remedy
  8. 2026Flow Straight to Reality: Perceptually Consistent Flow Matching for Efficient Image Restoration