Dude: A Dual-Detection Multi-Agent System for Paper-Code Discrepancy Detection
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
LLM-empowered paper-code discrepancy detection has received growing concern since the scaling of research submissions exceeds the manual review capability. However, the limited context capacity and one-sided discrepancy detection of existing single-agent LLM paradigms lead to an inferior recall performance in detecting discrepancies. In this paper, we propose Dude, the first Dual-Detection Multi-Agent System for paper-code discrepancy detection. We discover that the granularity asymmetry of the paper-language and code-language introduces over-interpretation and over-reporting challenges in a multi-agent system design for discrepancy detection, resulting in increasing false positives. To address this, we propose a granularity-aligned negotiation and a two-stage salience-filtering mechanism in Dude, which effectively prevents agents from falsely reporting discrepancies. Experimental results in real-world paper-code discrepancy datasets showcase Dude's significant recall and precision improvement by up to 22.8%, increasing F1 score by up to 18.7% compared to baseline methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.
Builds on
17 of 30 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2026SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignment19 Jan
- 2024SUPER: Evaluating Agents on Setting Up and Executing Tasks from Research Repositories11 Sep
Other references · 15
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 995
- 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 893
- 2023MedAgents: Large Language Models as Collaborators for Zero-shot Medical Reasoningcited by 311
- 2023ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewingcited by 118
- 2025DeepScientist: Advancing Frontier-Pushing Scientific Findings Progressivelycited by 56
- 2024UniDebugger: Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Unified Software Debuggingcited by 35
- 2020Deep Just-In-Time Inconsistency Detection Between Comments and Source Codecited by 20
- 2025AgentMaster: A Multi-Agent Conversational Framework Using A2A and MCP Protocols for Multimodal Information Retrieval and Analysiscited by 13
- 2025Reviewing Scientific Papers for Critical Problems With Reasoning LLMs: Baseline Approaches and Automatic Evaluationcited by 12
- 2025FLAWS: A Benchmark for Error Identification and Localization in Scientific Paperscited by 12
- 2025To Err Is Human: Systematic Quantification of Errors in Published AI Papers via LLM Analysiscited by 5
3 more
- 2026Preventing the Collapse of Peer Review Requires Verification-First AIcited by 3
- 2026MACRO-LLM: LLM-Empowered Multi-Agent Collaborative Reasoning under Spatiotemporal Partial Observabilitycited by 1
- 2026Do Papers Tell the Whole Story? A Benchmark and Framework for Uncovering Hidden Implementation Gaps in Bioinformaticscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Multi-Agent Debate: A Unified Agentic Framework for Tabular Anomaly Detection
- 2026DIAGPaper: Diagnosing Valid and Specific Weaknesses in Scientific Papers via Multi-Agent Reasoning
- 2026Adversarial Review: Structured Disagreement for Grounded Agentic Code Review
- 2026Insights Generator: Systematic Corpus-Level Trace Diagnostics for LLM Agents
- 2026Grading the Grader: Lessons from Evaluating an Agentic Data Analysis System
- 2026Coding-agents can replicate scientific machine learning papers
- 2025Paper2Code: Automating Code Generation from Scientific Papers in Machine Learning
- 2026When Agents Implement Systems: A Case Study in Defects, Detection, and Evaluation Rigor