mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

XMerge: Cross-Axis Selection and Reconstructive Layer Merging for LLM Depth Compression

arXiv 2609.02083 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Removing complete transformer layers preserves a standard serving architecture, but existing depth-compression methods can lose substantial quality, and the loss varies unpredictably across models. We introduce XMerge, a post-training method with two components. Cross-axis selection identifies a block with low relative-magnitude and angular hidden-state change, and local boundary reconstruction re-fits the adjacent surviving block to match the original two-block output. XMerge uses no task labels or end-to-end fine-tuning, and it introduces neither architectural changes nor additional inference-time parameters. Across seven Llama and Qwen backbones (0.5B-8B), five published baselines, and three layer-reduction levels, its advantage over baselines is largest at the most aggressive removal: at k=4 it ranks first on six of seven backbones on CORE (a 22-task aggregate) and, separately, on six of seven on MMLU (five of seven on both at once), while avoiding the large perplexity increases of several competing operators. In a task-level bootstrap, the 95% confidence intervals for the three largest CORE margins exclude zero; the remaining margins are consistent with ties. Across the 14 (model, regime) cells it is also the only evaluated operator that never collapses, ranking top-2 in both zero-shot and in-context regimes; on a first calibration probe (one backbone) it is the best-calibrated operator. Ablations show that local reconstruction provides most of the gain, while cross-axis fusion helps when the two selection axes disagree. The additional construction cost is recovered through per-token decode savings after roughly tens of thousands of requests.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2026.

Builds on

25 of 27 references.

References · 25

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  5. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  6. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  7. 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
  8. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
  9. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,121
  10. 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
  11. 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 800
  12. 2023LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 650
13 more
  1. 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 398
  2. 2024ShortGPT: Layers in Large Language Models are More Redundant Than You Expectcited by 383
  3. 2024LaCo: Large Language Model Pruning via Layer Collapsecited by 126
  4. 2024SLEB: Streamlining LLMs through Redundancy Verification and Elimination of Transformer Blockscited by 97
  5. 2023The LLM Surgeoncited by 38
  6. 2024Streamlining Redundant Layers to Compress Large Language Modelscited by 35
  7. 2024Pruning via Merging: Compressing LLMs via Manifold Alignment Based Layer Mergingcited by 19
  8. 2025ReplaceMe: Network Simplification via Depth Pruning and Transformer Block Linearizationcited by 13
  9. 2025Sliding-Window Merging for Compacting Patch-Redundant Layers in LLMscited by 9
  10. 2025Layer as Puzzle Pieces: Compressing Large Language Models through Layer Concatenationcited by 6
  11. 2025Prune&Comp: Free Lunch for Layer-Pruned LLMs via Iterative Pruning with Magnitude Compensationcited by 5
  12. 2025A Free Lunch in LLM Compression: Revisiting Retraining after Pruningcited by 1
  13. 2026The Structure of Quantization Damage in LLMs: Why the Next Bit Should Be Spent Globallycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.