The Dynamics of Continuous Mixture Collapse in Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
LLMs latent-state reasoning methods replace discrete intermediate tokens with continuous states, such as weighted mixtures of token embeddings, to retain multiple possible reasoning directions rather than committing to one. Yet pretrained language models often fail to preserve these mixtures. We study why through a combination of theoretical analysis and controlled empirical investigations on a variety of models. We identify three independent, distinct sources of failure. First, transformer architectures already distort mixture geometry, and training substantially amplifies this effect. Moreover, the failure can occur even if the model transports mixtures perfectly linearly: the softmax readout and autoregressive feedback form a dynamical system that either amplifies small differences until one component of the mixture dominates or contracts different mixtures until they become indistinguishable. We verify this theoretical prediction empirically: the observed transition between contraction and amplification occurs near the theoretical threshold derived by our analysis, and pretrained-model rollouts lie predominantly on the amplifying side. Finally, we generalize to mixtures of many components and show that exact preservation generally requires context-dependent correction, whose required dimensionality can grow with the number of components.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2026.
Builds on
16 of 22 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2026SeLaR: Selective Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models9 Apr
- 2025LLM Latent Reasoning as Chain of Superposition17 Oct
Other references · 14
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2021Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Modelscited by 871
- 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 763
- 2025CODI: Compressing Chain-of-Thought into Continuous Space via Self-Distillationcited by 216
- 2025Soft Thinking: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of LLMs in Continuous Concept Spacecited by 109
- 2025Reasoning by Superposition: A Theoretical Perspective on Chain of Continuous Thoughtcited by 73
- 2025LLMs are Single-threaded Reasoners: Demystifying the Working Mechanism of Soft Thinkingcited by 34
- 2025Continuous Chain of Thought Enables Parallel Exploration and Reasoningcited by 32
- 2025SofT-GRPO: Surpassing Discrete-Token LLM Reinforcement Learning via Gumbel-Reparameterized Soft-Thinking Policy Optimizationcited by 18
- 2025Emergence of Superposition: Unveiling the Training Dynamics of Chain of Continuous Thoughtcited by 16
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Beyond Exponential Decay: Rethinking Error Accumulation in Large Language Models
- 2025On the Failure of Latent State Persistence in Large Language Models
- 2026Reasoning with Latent Tokens in Diffusion Language Models
- 2026A Mechanistic Analysis of Looped Reasoning Language Models
- 2026Dissecting Failure Dynamics in Large Language Model Reasoning
- 2025Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-training
- 2025A Statistical Physics of Language Model Reasoning
- 2026Representation Collapse in Sequential Post-Training of Large Language Models