mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Network-Aware Forecasting on Wireless Access Points

arXiv 2609.01957 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2026cs.NI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Enterprise wireless access points (APs) are promising platforms for predictive machine learning (ML), but their primary responsibility remains providing wireless connectivity and network services. Predictive inference must therefore share an AP's CPU and memory with packet processing, Wi-Fi and IoT radio operations, and client management. This resource contention creates two risks: a model that performs well on proxy hardware may be too slow on the target AP, while a model that fits in isolation may still degrade network services under load. We define textitnetwork-aware deployability using two gates: qualification of the model and its execution path on the target AP, followed by validation of its execution profile under packet-service and forecasting constraints. Our benchmarks show that edge testbeds do not reliably capture target behavior. Across matched artifacts and serving settings, five model implementations run 6.1--19.1× slower on an AP than on a Raspberry Pi~5, while peak memory usage differs by up to 22%. Moreover, two forecasting foundation models of similar size differ in AP latency by 19×. When serving a smaller model across 13 parallel streams at a 30~s cadence under network saturation, default execution increases p99 round-trip time (RTT) by 76% and reduces throughput by 7.06%. Understanding these trade-offs is essential for live deployment if we aim to use APs for both networking and ML workloads.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2026.

Builds on

10 of 12 references.

References · 10

  1. 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 943
  2. 2019Once-for-All: Train One Network and Specialize it for Efficient Deploymentcited by 787
  3. 2023A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecastingcited by 692
  4. 2018HAQ: Hardware-Aware Automated Quantization with Mixed Precisioncited by 443
  5. 2018NetAdapt: Platform-Aware Neural Network Adaptation for Mobile Applicationscited by 147
  6. 2020Serving DNNs like Clockwork: Performance Predictability from the Bottom Upcited by 120
  7. 2018NestDNN: Resource-Aware Multi-Tenant On-Device Deep Learning for Continuous Mobile Visioncited by 68
  8. 2026Toto 2.0: Time Series Forecasting Enters the Scaling Eracited by 30
  9. 2026A Family of Open Time-Series Foundation Models for the Radio Access Networkcited by 2
  10. 2026APEX: A Network-Native Time-Series Foundation Model for Forecasting and Anomaly Detection for Wireless Edge Operationscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.