mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating Multimodal LLMs as Generalist Vision-Language-Action Agents for Drone Control: Commanding, Approaching, Tracking and Searching

arXiv 2609.01404 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2026cs.RO cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models

also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are strong perceivers of images and video. We ask how far that reach extends into acting: dropping an MLLM directly into a drone's control loop, with its entire action space declared solely in the prompt. Recent systems approach this setting but increasingly narrow the model's decision-making. We widen it back. We introduce DroneCATS-Agent, an architecture where the MLLM is a swappable component, and DroneCATS, a benchmark treating the model as the independent variable. Beyond merely flying toward a pixel, our agent entrusts the model to yaw and search, deliberate when unsure, and self-declare arrival---all without fine-tuning or function-calling schemas. Evaluating frontier and open models across four core capabilities---approaching a visible target, tracking a moving one, searching outside the initial view, and commanding a multi-drone fleet---reveals that even the simplest embodied settings are far from solved. Crucially, to identify what breaks first at the edge, our roster scales down to 2B parameters. The findings expose a stark paradox: it is not the flying that fails. Small open models often navigate into the success radius more reliably than frontier models, yet lose the episode by declaring arrival prematurely or not at all. Multi-drone commanding amplifies this divide, with small models failing by blindly copying a single coordinate across distinct views. Viewed as vision-language-action agents, the models' spatial perception holds up, but their action protocol does not. What separates a deployable edge model from a frontier model is not navigation, but the discipline to sustain a declared protocol and emit the correct terminating action. The open problem is closing this gap at onboard compute costs---yielding a fast model that plans persistently and knows exactly when it is done---and DroneCATS is built to measure that distance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 29 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.

Builds on

29 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026AirHunt: Bridging VLM Semantics and Continuous Planning for Efficient Aerial Object Navigation19 Jan
  2. 2025AirCopBench: A Benchmark for Multi-drone Collaborative Embodied Perception and Reasoning14 Nov
  3. 2025See, Point, Fly: A Learning-Free VLM Framework for Universal Unmanned Aerial Navigation26 Sep
  4. 2025UrbanVideo-Bench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Embodied Intelligence with Video Data in Urban Spaces8 Mar
  5. 2024RoboPoint: A Vision-Language Model for Spatial Affordance Prediction for Robotics15 Jun
  6. 2024PIVOT: Iterative Visual Prompting Elicits Actionable Knowledge for VLMs12 Feb

Other references · 23

  1. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  2. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  3. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
  4. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,534
  5. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,179
  6. 2024LLaVA-Video: Video Instruction Tuning With Synthetic Datacited by 550
  7. 2017AirSim: High-Fidelity Visual and Physical Simulation for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 517
  8. 2026Cosmos 3: Omnimodal World Models for Physical AIcited by 137
  9. 2024MOKA: Open-World Robotic Manipulation through Mark-Based Visual Promptingcited by 126
  10. 2023AerialVLN: Vision-and-Language Navigation for UAVscited by 117
  11. 2025UAV-ON: A Benchmark for Open-World Object Goal Navigation with Aerial Agentscited by 31
  12. 2025CognitiveDrone: A VLA Model and Evaluation Benchmark for Real-Time Cognitive Task Solving and Reasoning in UAVscited by 21
11 more
  1. 2025BEDI: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Embodied Agents on UAVscited by 10
  2. 2024On Efficient Language and Vision Assistants for Visually-Situated Natural Language Understanding: What Matters in Reading and Reasoningcited by 7
  3. 2025RALLY: Role-Adaptive LLM-Driven Yoked Navigation for Agentic UAV Swarmscited by 7
  4. 2026Vision-and-Language Navigation for UAVs: Progress, Challenges, and a Research Roadmapcited by 5
  5. 2025Taking Flight with Dialogue: Enabling Natural Language Control for PX4-based Drone Agentcited by 4
  6. 2026UAV-Track VLA: Embodied Aerial Tracking via Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 4
  7. 2026ESARBench: A Benchmark for Agentic UAV Embodied Search and Rescuecited by 4
  8. 2025State-Space Hierarchical Compression with Gated Attention and Learnable Sampling for Hour-Long Video Understanding in Large Multimodal Modelscited by 3
  9. 2026Fly0: Persistent Metric Anchoring for Zero-Shot Aerial Vision-Language Navigationcited by 3
  10. 2026DeTrack: A Benchmark and Altitude-Aware Dual World Model for Drone-embodied Trackingcited by 2
  11. 2026ActiveFly-Bench: Aligning Embodied Question Answering with Vision-Language-Action for Aerial Embodied Perceptioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Benchmarking the Generality of Vision-Language-Action Models
  2. 2026Zero-Shot Mission-Level Evaluation for Aerial MLLM Agents
  3. 2026Uni-LaViRA: Language-Vision-Robot Actions Translation for Unified Embodied Navigation
  4. 2026LiteVLA-H: Dual-Rate Vision-Language-Action Inference for Onboard Aerial Guidance and Semantic Perception
  5. 2026VLN-Pilot: Large Vision-Language Model as an Autonomous Indoor Drone Operator
  6. 2026GLM-5V-Turbo: Toward a Native Foundation Model for Multimodal Agents
  7. 2025Agentic Aerial Cinematography: From Dialogue Cues to Cinematic Trajectories
  8. 2025SINGER: An Onboard Generalist Vision-Language Navigation Policy for Drones